Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About DMM
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contact
    • Contact DMM
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Disease Models & Mechanisms
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Advanced search

RSS   Twitter   Facebook   YouTube

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About DMM
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contact
    • Contact DMM
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Journal Club
Progression of endometriosis to cancer: too MUCh FoxP3+ regulatory T-cell response?
G. Aleph Prieto
Disease Models & Mechanisms 2011 4: 139-140; doi: 10.1242/dmm.007278
G. Aleph Prieto
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Endometriosis, a major contributor to pelvic pain and subfertility, affects 6–10% of women of reproductive age and is characterized by endometrial-like tissue outside the uterus, mainly in the pelvic peritoneum and ovaries (Giudice, 2010). It is becoming widely accepted that endometriosis, especially ovarian endometriotic cysts, is a neoplastic disease and, consequently, might have malignant potential (Mandai et al., 2009). However, the pathological mechanisms underlying the development and maintenance of endometriosis, and its progression to cancer, remain to be elucidated. It is known that adaptive (T and B cells) and innate [including natural killer (NK) cells] immunity are both important for preventing primary tumour formation; thus, in order to progress to advanced stages, tumours must be able to evade or suppress immunity (Cao, 2010). Therefore, understanding the mechanisms of tumour tolerance is a major challenge for cancer research.

Various molecular alterations have been linked to the malignant transformation of endometriosis: hyperestrogenism, changes in the expression of cytokines, and mutation or loss of function of the tumour suppressor genes p53, Kras and PTEN (Mandai et al., 2009). The relevance of the genetic alterations in Kras and PTEN has been further supported by an elegant mouse model involving Cre-loxP recombination in loxP-Stop-loxP-KrasG12D/+ (Kras) mice, in which forced expression of oncogenic Kras in ovarian surface epithelium results in ectopic endometrial-like morphology. Furthermore, the combination of both Kras expression and conditional PTEN deletion gives rise to ovarian carcinoma (Dinulescu et al., 2005).

Genetic and epigenetic changes in tumour cells also induce the expression of antigens (Cao, 2010), such as MUC1, a membrane-bound mucin that is normally expressed in most epithelial cells but is overexpressed and aberrantly glycosylated in various carcinomas (Bafna et al., 2010), including in ovarian cancer (Van Elssen et al., 2010). It has also been proposed that MUC1 contributes to growth and survival of cancer cells by stimulating estrogen-receptor-α-mediated transcription (Bafna et al., 2010). Therefore, MUC1 is a potential target for immunotherapy strategies to treat ovarian cancer. However, the immunogenic properties of MUC1 in precursor lesions such as endometriosis have not been extensively explored. In a previous issue of Disease Models & Mechanisms, Budiu et al. (Budiu et al., 2009) investigated this topic by studying the antigen-specific immune response induced by the expression of human MUC1 in the Kras conditional mouse model of endometriosis (discussed above). The novel model, named MUC1Kras, was generated by crossing Kras mice with transgenic mice expressing human MUC1 under its endogenous promoter (Budiu et al., 2009).

The authors first validated the use of MUC1 as a marker for human endometriosis: MUC1 glycoprotein was found to be normally expressed on epithelial cells of eutopic endometrial glands in human uterus and, notably, ectopic (endometriotic) glands in ovaries were also MUC1 positive (MUC1+). Quantitative PCR confirmed that samples of ovarian tissue from patients with ovarian endometriosis exhibited increased levels of MUC1 mRNA compared with samples obtained from normal ovaries (see figure 1 in Budiu et al., 2009).

Next, the authors examined the pattern of MUC1 expression in the MUC1Kras mouse strain. The distribution of human MUC1 protein throughout the gynaecological tract of healthy (i.e. unexposed to Cre recombinase) MUC1Kras female mice closely resembled that observed in healthy humans (see figure 2 in Budiu et al., 2009). Delivery of recombinant adenovirus for targeted expression of Cre recombinase (AdCre) in the ovarian bursa (capsule) of MUC1Kras mice resulted in ovarian endometriotic lesions after 32 weeks (at 12 and 24 weeks, lesions were not detected), as previously observed in Kras mice (Dinulescu et al., 2005). Estrogen receptor and cytokeratin 7, which are typical markers used to diagnose endometriosis, were also detected in ovarian lesions by histological staining. Importantly, lesions were also MUC1+ (see figures 3 and 4 in Budiu et al., 2009). At 32 weeks post-AdCre-injection, when ovarian endometriotic lesions had developed, increased expression of MUC1 was detected in both ovarian and bursal epithelial cells, suggesting that the level of expression of MUC1 positively correlates with the development of disease in MUC1Kras mice (see figure 5 in Budiu et al., 2009).

The authors then studied the immunogenicity of MUC1 during disease development. They first assessed the humoral (B cell) response to MUC1. Blood samples were collected at 12 and 32 weeks after AdCre injection, and the presence of antibodies against MUC1 was determined and compared with baseline antibody levels. Although no changes were found in the Kras mice at any time point, an increased humoral immune response specific for the MUC1 antigen was found in both MUC1 and MUC1Kras mice. When comparing these two strains, titers of MUC1-specific IgM antibodies were found to be higher in MUC1Kras mice than in MUC1 mice at both 12 and 32 weeks. Conversely, anti-MUC1 IgG titers in MUC1Kras mice significantly increased only after 32 weeks, when IgM titers decreased, reflecting an IgM-to-IgG isotype switch (see figure 6 in Budiu et al., 2009).

Although effector T cells, B cells and NK cells are known to be involved in anti-tumour immunity, recent studies have implicated regulatory T cells in inducing tolerance to tumours (Cao, 2010). Initially associated with the control of autoimmune responses (Sakaguchi et al., 1995), regulatory T cells (TReg cells) – a subset of CD4+ T cells expressing the transcription factor forkhead box P3 (FoxP3) – were subsequently recognized to limit essentially all types of adaptive immune responses (Sakaguchi et al., 2010). When Budiu et al. analyzed T cell populations in MUC1Kras mice, they found an increase in the percentage of CD4+FoxP3+ TReg cells in the draining lymph nodes of both MUC1Kras and Kras diseased mice (at 32 weeks) compared with uninjected MUC1Kras controls (Budiu et al., 2009). Analyses of spleen cells also showed an increase in the percentage of TReg cells in the diseased mice, whereas the percentage of interferon-γ-producing splenic T cells after polyclonal stimulation (an indicator of anti-tumour activity) was lower in MUC1Kras diseased mice than in healthy age-matched MUC1Kras mice. Importantly, these changes were only detected after 32 weeks, when detectable lesions had developed in MUC1Kras and Kras mice. Finally, and most importantly, the authors reported that FOXP3 mRNA levels were higher in tissue samples from patients with endometriosis than in samples from healthy controls, suggesting an increase in the size of the TReg cell population in endometriosis. Consistent with this, flow cytometry analysis of the CD4+ T cells infiltrating the ovaries of two patients with endometriosis showed that they had higher proportions of TReg cells at the site of lesions, but not in the peripheral blood (see figure 7 in Budiu et al., 2009).

Data from Budiu et al. (Budiu et al., 2009) and more recently from Berbic et al. (Berbic et al., 2010) uncover an association between altered levels of TReg cells and endometriosis. Given the apparent increase in the size of the TReg cell population at the site of lesions in both diseased MUC1Kras mice and patients with endometriosis, it is plausible that downregulation of local immune responses by a TReg-cell-dependent mechanism could underlie deficient clearing of lesions. However, the antigen specificity and origin of these TReg cells remain to be clarified. TReg cells can be generated in the thymus (referred to as naturally occurring TReg cells) or in response to specific microenvironments (referred to as induced TReg cells) (Sakaguchi et al., 2010). In addition, TReg cells proliferate in response to external signals such as those provided during antigen presentation by mature dendritic cells (Walker, 2004). Notably, physiological levels of estradiol, such as would be present in ovarian lesions, have been shown to enhance the proliferation of human TReg cells responding to T-cell-receptor engagement (Prieto and Rosenstein, 2006). It is thus possible that estradiol promotes the onset of immunological tolerance to MUC1 once it is overexpressed during endometriosis development through expanding a pre-existing pool of MUC1-specific TReg cells. Given that MUC1 is an ovarian-tumour-associated antigen (Van Elssen et al., 2010), this hypothesis predicts that local expansion of TReg cells that are specific for MUC1 might suppress anti-tumour responses and facilitate the progression of endometriosis to ovarian cancer in susceptible women. Interestingly, tolerance to tumour antigen, causing general cytotoxic T cell unresponsiveness, has been reported to occur at the premalignant stage in a transgenic mouse model of sporadic cancer, despite the production of tumour-specific antibodies; this was shown to be a condition that was permissive for cancer progression (Willimsky et al., 2008). However, whether this tolerance is mediated by TReg cells remains to be investigated.

The MUC1Kras mice reported in this study combine the advantages of previous endometriosis animal models – non-human primates (that closely parallel human endometriosis) and heterologous transplanted mice (that allow different experimental approaches at lower cost but are immunosuppressed) (Tirado-Gonzalez et al., 2010) – to investigate the role of immune suppression in endometriosis and ovarian cancer. Furthermore, MUC1Kras mice offer a valuable in vivo system in which to evaluate preventive and therapeutic strategies for endometriosis and ovarian cancer. Because estradiol boosts the proliferation of TReg cells, MUC1Kras mice could be used to test the potential benefits of the local delivery of anti-estrogenic compounds to prevent ovarian cancer development in endometriosis patients.

Acknowledgements

Helpful comments from Yvonne Rosenstein and Carl W. Cotman guided this manuscript.

  • © 2011. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly cited and all further distributions of the work or adaptation are subject to the same Creative Commons License terms.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Bafna, S.,
    2. Kaur, S. and
    3. Batra, S. K.
    (2010). Membrane-bound mucins: the mechanistic basis for alterations in the growth and survival of cancer cells. Oncogene 29, 2893–2904.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Berbic, M.,
    2. Hey-Cunningham, A. J.,
    3. Ng, C.,
    4. Tokushige, N.,
    5. Ganewatta, S.,
    6. Markham, R.,
    7. Russell, P. and
    8. Fraser, I. S.
    (2010). The role of Foxp3+ regulatory T-cells in endometriosis: a potential controlling mechanism for a complex, chronic immunological condition. Hum. Reprod. 25, 900–907.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Budiu, R. A.,
    2. Diaconu, I.,
    3. Chrissluis, R.,
    4. Dricu, A.,
    5. Edwards, R. P. and
    6. Vlad, A. M.
    (2009). A conditional mouse model for human MUC1-positive endometriosis shows the presence of anti-MUC1 antibodies and Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. Dis. Model. Mech. 2, 593–603.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Cao, X.
    (2010). Regulatory T cells and immune tolerance to tumors. Immunol. Res. 46, 79–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Dinulescu, D. M.,
    2. Ince, T. A.,
    3. Bradley, J. Q.,
    4. Shafer, S. A.,
    5. Crowley, D. and
    6. Jacks, T.
    (2005). Role of K-ras and Pten in the development of mouse models of endometriosis and endometrioid ovarian cancer. Nat. Med. 11, 63–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Giudice, L. C.
    (2010). Endometriosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 362, 2389–2398.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Mandai, M.,
    2. Yamaguchi, K.,
    3. Matsumura, N.,
    4. Baba, T. and
    5. Konishi, I.
    (2009). Ovarian cancer in endometriosis: molecular biology, pathology, and clinical management. Int. J. Clin. Oncol 14, 383–391.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Prieto, G. A. and
    2. Rosenstein, Y.
    (2006). Oestradiol potentiates the suppressive function of human CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells by promoting their proliferation. Immunology 118, 58–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. Sakaguchi, S.,
    2. Sakaguchi, N.,
    3. Asano, M.,
    4. Itoh, M. and
    5. Toda, M.
    (1995). Immunological self-tolerance maintained by activated T cells expressing IL-2 receptor α-chains (CD25). Breakdown of a single mechanism of self-tolerance causes various autoimmune diseases. J. Immunol. 155, 1151–1164.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Sakaguchi, S.,
    2. Miyara, M.,
    3. Costantino, C. M. and
    4. Hafler, D.
    (2010). FOXP3+ regulatory T cells in the human immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 10, 490–500.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Tirado-Gonzalez, I.,
    2. Barrientos, G.,
    3. Tariverdian, N.,
    4. Arck, P. C.,
    5. Garcia, M.,
    6. Klapp, B. F. and
    7. Blois, S. M.
    (2010). Endometriosis research: animal models for the study of complex disease. J. Reprod. Immunol. 86, 141–147.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Van Elssen, C. H. M. J.,
    2. Frings, P. W. H,
    3. Bot, F. J.,
    4. Van de Vijver, K. K.,
    5. Huls, M. B.,
    6. Meek, B.,
    7. Hupperets, P.,
    8. Germeraad, W. T. V and
    9. Bos, G. M. J
    (2010). Expression of aberrantly glycosylated Mucin-1 in ovarian cancer. Histopathology 57, 597–606.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Walker, L. S.
    (2004). CD4+ CD25+ Treg: divide and rule? Immunology 111,129–137.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Willimsky, G.,
    2. Czeh, M.,
    3. Loddenkemper, C.,
    4. Gellermann, J.,
    5. Schmidt, K.,
    6. Wust, P.,
    7. Stein, H. and
    8. Blankenstein, T.
    (2008). Immunogenicity of premalignant lesions is the primary cause of general cytotoxicity T lymphocyte unresponsiveness. J. Exp. Med. 205, 1687–1700.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

RSSRSS

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Disease Models & Mechanisms.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Progression of endometriosis to cancer: too MUCh FoxP3+ regulatory T-cell response?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Disease Models & Mechanisms
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Disease Models & Mechanisms web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Journal Club
Progression of endometriosis to cancer: too MUCh FoxP3+ regulatory T-cell response?
G. Aleph Prieto
Disease Models & Mechanisms 2011 4: 139-140; doi: 10.1242/dmm.007278
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Journal Club
Progression of endometriosis to cancer: too MUCh FoxP3+ regulatory T-cell response?
G. Aleph Prieto
Disease Models & Mechanisms 2011 4: 139-140; doi: 10.1242/dmm.007278

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Acknowledgements
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Modelling how initiating and transforming oncogenes cooperate to produce a leukaemic cell state
  • Finding NECA: zebrafish screen identifies key signalling pathway in β-cell regeneration
  • Lactate-starved neurons in ALS
Show more Journal Club

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Biology Open

Advertisement

DMM and COVID-19

We are aware that the COVID-19 pandemic is having an unprecedented impact on researchers worldwide. The Editors of all The Company of Biologists’ journals have been considering ways in which we can alleviate concerns that members of our community may have around publishing activities during this time. Read about the actions we are taking at this time.

Please don’t hesitate to contact the Editorial Office if you have any questions or concerns.


The twin pillars of Disease Models & Mechanisms

In her first Editorial as Editor-in-Chief, Liz Patton sets out her vision and priorities for DMM focusing on four thematic challenges: mechanisms of disease, innovative technologies, disease progression through time and therapy.


Extended deadline - The RAS Pathway: Diseases, Therapeutics and Beyond

Our upcoming special issue is welcoming submissions until 3 May 2021. Guest-edited by Donita Brady (Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, USA) and Arvin Dar (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, USA), the issue will focus on the targeting the RAS pathway.

Find out more about the issue and how to submit your manuscript.


Perspective - Modelling the developmental origins of paediatric cancer to improve patient outcomes

James Amatruda authors our first Perspective, discussing some of the key challenges in paediatric cancer from his perspective as a physician-scientist.


A muscle growth-promoting treatment based on the attenuation of activin/myostatin signalling results in long-term testicular abnormalities

In this issue’s Editor’s choice, Ketan Patel and colleagues describe how even brief exposure to muscle-growth-promoting treatments exerts a long-term detrimental effect on the testes, and test promising therapeutics to mitigate this side-effect.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About DMM
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact DMM
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992