Advertisement
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Early evidence of delayed oligodendrocyte maturation in the mouse model of mucolipidosis type IV
Molly Mepyans, Livia Andrzejczuk, Jahree Sosa, Sierra Smith, Shawn Herron, Samantha DeRosa, Susan A. Slaugenhaupt, Albert Misko, Yulia Grishchuk, Kirill Kiselyov
Disease Models & Mechanisms 2020 13: dmm044230 doi: 10.1242/dmm.044230 Published 30 July 2020

Handling Editor: Steven J. Clapcote

ABSTRACT

Mucolipidosis type IV (MLIV) is a lysosomal disease caused by mutations in the MCOLN1 gene that encodes the endolysosomal transient receptor potential channel mucolipin-1, or TRPML1. MLIV results in developmental delay, motor and cognitive impairments, and vision loss. Brain abnormalities include thinning and malformation of the corpus callosum, white-matter abnormalities, accumulation of undegraded intracellular ‘storage’ material and cerebellar atrophy in older patients. Identification of the early events in the MLIV course is key to understanding the disease and deploying therapies. The Mcoln1−/− mouse model reproduces all major aspects of the human disease. We have previously reported hypomyelination in the MLIV mouse brain. Here, we investigated the onset of hypomyelination and compared oligodendrocyte maturation between the cortex/forebrain and cerebellum. We found significant delays in expression of mature oligodendrocyte markers Mag, Mbp and Mobp in the Mcoln1−/− cortex, manifesting as early as 10 days after birth and persisting later in life. Such delays were less pronounced in the cerebellum. Despite our previous finding of diminished accumulation of the ferritin-bound iron in the Mcoln1−/− brain, we report no significant changes in expression of the cytosolic iron reporters, suggesting that iron-handling deficits in MLIV occur in the lysosomes and do not involve broad iron deficiency. These data demonstrate very early deficits of oligodendrocyte maturation and critical regional differences in myelination between the forebrain and cerebellum in the mouse model of MLIV. Furthermore, they establish quantitative readouts of the MLIV impact on early brain development, useful to gauge efficacy in pre-clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION

Mucolipidosis type IV (MLIV) is an autosomal-recessive lysosomal storage disease caused by mutations in the MCOLN1 gene, located in humans in the 19p13.2 locus (Acierno et al., 2001). The disease was first described in 1974 (Berman et al., 1974) and the corresponding gene was reported in 1999 (Bargal et al., 2000; Raas-Rothschild et al., 1999; Slaugenhaupt et al., 1999). MCOLN1 encodes the late endosomal/lysosomal ion channel TRPML1, which has a range of reported functions including zinc and iron homeostasis, regulation of lysosomal acidification and calcium release driving membrane fusion/fission events, as well as lysosomal biogenesis (Cheng et al., 2014; Dong et al., 2008; Eichelsdoerfer et al., 2010; Kukic et al., 2013; Miao et al., 2015; Samie et al., 2013; Soyombo et al., 2006; Venkatachalam et al., 2008; Wong et al., 2012; Xu and Ren, 2015; Xu et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2012). Abnormalities of membrane traffic, autophagy and mitochondria have been reported in various MLIV tissues and models (Coblentz et al., 2014; Colletti et al., 2012; Jennings et al., 2006; Li et al., 2016; Miedel et al., 2008; Venkatachalam et al., 2008; Vergarajauregui et al., 2008; Wong et al., 2012; Xu et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2016).

MLIV patients typically present in the first year of life with psychomotor delay and visual impairment, which stems from a combination of corneal clouding, retinal dystrophy and optic atrophy (Abraham et al., 1985; Altarescu et al., 2002; Riedel et al., 1985; Schiffmann et al., 2014). Developmental gains can be appreciated during the first decade of life, although axial hypotonia, appendicular hypertonia and upper motor neuron weakness prevent ambulation and limit fine motor function in the majority of patients. Although a static course has been classically reported, progressive psychomotor decline has been documented. It begins in the second decade, eventually resulting in severe spastic quadriplegia (A.M., personal observations). In congruence with the clinical course, ancillary brain imaging has demonstrated stable white-matter abnormalities (corpus callosum hypoplasia/dysgenesis and white-matter lesions), with the emergence of subcortical volume loss and cerebellar atrophy in older patients. Despite a 19-year-long effort in the MLIV natural history program (NCT00015782, NCT01067742), owing to the low number of patients and poor availability of the human brain tissue for research (single case tissues are now available at the University of Maryland Brain and Tissue Bank, Baltimore, MD, USA), the mechanism(s) of MLIV brain disease is still not well understood. Pinpointing the early events in MLIV brain pathology is important to define the therapeutic window for intervention and set expectations for clinical trial outcomes.

Some important insights regarding brain pathology in MLIV have been obtained from the MLIV mouse model [Mcoln1 knockout (KO) mouse] developed by us (Grishchuk et al., 2014, 2016; Micsenyi et al., 2009; Venugopal et al., 2007). The mouse model shows all the hallmarks of MLIV, including motor deficits, retinal degeneration and reduced secretion of chloric acid by stomach parietal cells, leading to elevated plasma gastrin (Schiffmann et al., 1998). These hallmarks were also supported by the murine MLIV model generated by the Muallem group (Chandra et al., 2011). Similar to MLIV patients, we observed intracellular storage formations, thinning of the corpus callosum in the Mcoln1−/− mouse brain, micro- and astrogliosis, and partial loss of Purkinje cells at the late stage of the disease. Electron microscopy analysis shows reduced thickness of the myelin sheaths consistent with central nervous system (CNS) hypomyelination (Grishchuk et al., 2014).

Based on the existing natural history data in MLIV patients and our observations in the Mcoln1−/− mouse, MLIV can be thought of as having two distinct phases: the developmental phase, associated with early-onset delayed oligodendrocyte maturation and gliosis (Grishchuk et al., 2014; Weinstock et al., 2018), and the late degenerative phase, associated with partial loss of Purkinje cells in the MLIV mouse (Micsenyi et al., 2009) and mild cerebellar atrophy in some MLIV patients (Frei et al., 1998). Understanding the timing and mechanisms behind these distinct events is important for designing and testing therapies. Here, we investigate the role of TRPML1 in oligodendrocyte maturation and myelin deposition in the developing brain. Our data show early problems with oligodendrocyte maturation and myelination in higher-functioning brain regions such as the cerebral cortex. The role of TRPML1 in early brain development is further supported by the fact that its expression gradually rises in postnatal brain and expression is higher in the regions that display the most prominent deficits in myelination in TRPML1-deficient (Mcoln1−/−) mice (cerebral cortex). Finally, these data establish quantitative readouts of the TRPML1 impact on early brain development, which will be useful to gauge efficacy readouts in future therapy trials.

RESULTS

Mcoln1/TRPML1expression increases with age in the postnatal brain

Despite the emerging role of TRPML1 in a range of cellular functions, including cationic lysosomal homeostasis, cell repair (Colletti et al., 2012; Li et al., 2016; Miedel et al., 2008; Venkatachalam et al., 2008; Vergarajauregui et al., 2008; Wong et al., 2012; Xu et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2016) and, more recently, aging and cancer (Jung et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2019), the time course of Mcoln1/TRPML1 expression during the development of living tissue has not been tracked. To answer how Mcoln1/TRPML1 is regulated during brain development we analyzed its expression using quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) in 1-, 10-, 21- and 60-day-old mice. Actin B (Actb) was used as a housekeeping gene. Primer specificity was confirmed using Mcoln1−/− samples. Our data show a steady increase in Mcoln1 expression levels in the forebrain from birth to 2 months of age (Fig. 1). Mcoln1 mRNA levels increased 4-fold (4.45±0.56, n=3 or 4, P=0.003) in the whole-cerebrum samples of wild-type (WT) animals between postnatal day (P)1 and P10 (Fig. 1A). Focusing specifically on the isolated cortical tissues, we found a 6-fold increase in Mcoln1 mRNA levels between P10 and P60 (6.31±1.10, n=3, statistically significant linear trend with P=0.0028 using one-way ANOVA; Fig. 1C). By contrast, although Mcoln1 mRNA levels also increased in the cerebellar samples between P1 and P10 (Fig. 1B) and P10 and P60 (Fig. 1C), the increases were small and did not attain statistical significance or significant linear trend. We found a similar trend in the Mcoln1 expression data generated by the Functional Annotation of Mammalian Genome (FANTOM5) project (Ha et al., 2019; Lizio et al., 2015; Noguchi et al., 2017; Vitezic et al., 2014) (Fig. S1A). Although the design of the study does not allow direct comparison of transcriptional activation of Mcoln1 between visual cortex and cerebellum, the stable expression of Mcoln1 in cerebellum in the pre- and early-postnatal phase and increased expression in postnatal visual cortex are consistent with the data we report here. Our Mcoln1 expression data are the first on the developmental dynamics of Mcoln1 transcription that allow comparison between different brain regions, cortex and cerebellum.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Increasing Mcoln1 expression in the brain during development. (A,B) qPCR analysis of Mcoln1 mRNA in the whole forebrain (A) and cerebellum (B) in Mcoln1+/+ (WT) and Mcoln1−/− (KO) mice, showing a significant increase with age. Analysis of expression was performed using ΔΔCt method; Actb was used as a housekeeping gene. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison tests. n=3-5; ***P<0.0005 and **P<0.005. (C) Mcoln1 expression dynamics in the cortical and cerebellum samples of P10-P60 mice. The symbols represent an average of three to four experiments. Three to four biological replicates; **P<0.005 calculated using one-way ANOVA. (D) Tpcn1 mRNA expression in the Mcoln1+/+ and Mcoln1−/− cerebral cortex. n=3-5; *P<0.05 calculated using one-way ANOVA. ns, P>0.05; error bars represent s.e.m.

Mcoln1-encoded endolysosomal cation channel TRPML1 is involved in lysosomal function and signaling (Xu and Ren, 2015). We compared its expression profile with that of another endolysosomal cation channel, TPC1 (encoded by Tpcn1) (Yamaguchi et al., 2011). Interestingly, Tpcn1 mRNA did not increase with age in the mouse cerebral cortex (Fig. 1D). This, to our knowledge, is the first analysis of Tpcn1 expression in the developing brain. Therefore, Mcoln1 mRNA upregulation during development is specific to this gene rather than a more general increase in expression of the lysosomal channels. The difference between Mcoln1 and Tpcn1 expression implies that functions of the corresponding ion channels in the developing brain are distinct. The rapid pace of Mcoln1 mRNA increase in the developing brain suggests its importance in development. Interestingly, there was a significant increase in the Tpcn1 mRNA levels in the Mcoln1−/− samples at the P60 time point (7.83±2.27-fold increase, n=3, statistically significant linear trend with P=0.047 using one-way ANOVA). RNA sequencing analysis on isolated brain cell types shows enrichment of the Tpcn1 transcripts specifically in astrocytes, macrophage/microglia and endothelial cells (Zhang et al., 2014); therefore, the increase in its expression in Mcoln1−/− brain could reflect astrocytosis and microgliosis, a known prominent feature of brain pathology in MLIV (Grishchuk et al., 2014; Micsenyi et al., 2009; Weinstock et al., 2018) (Fig. S1B).

Early myelination deficits due to loss of Mcoln1/TRPML1 are caused by delayed oligodendrocyte maturation

We have previously shown hypomyelination in the mouse model of MLIV (Grishchuk et al., 2015), suggesting oligodendrocyte involvement. The original data, however, did not clarify whether the hypomyelination is a result of a lower number of oligodendrocytes due to loss of precursors or caused by their defective maturation. To gain more insight, we performed an expression time course of oligodendrocyte maturation markers in postnatal development starting at birth to 2 months of age. To assess oligodendrocyte maturation, we used three of the key myelin genes: myelin-associated glycoprotein precursor (Mag), myelin basic protein (Mbp) and myelin-associated oligodendrocyte basic protein (Mobp) (Han et al., 2013; Huang et al., 2013; Pérez et al., 2013; Robinson et al., 2014). In the forebrain samples, the three markers showed linear increase between P1 and P21, allowing us to compare the dynamics of oligodendrocyte maturation during brain development (Fig. 2). In both WT and KO samples, Mobp mRNA showed a statistically significant linear trend (P=0.0021 and P=0.0438, respectively, calculated using one-way ANOVA, n=3 or 4; Fig. 2A). At P21, Mobp mRNA increase was significantly higher in the Mcoln1+/+ relative to Mcoln1−/− samples (P=0.037 using unpaired Student's t-test, n=5-7). This trend persisted for Mbp (Fig. 2B). Interestingly, while Mag mRNA levels showed linear increase between P1 and P21, the rate of Mag mRNA increase was significantly lower than that of Mobp and Mbp mRNA and did not differ significantly between Mcoln1+/+ relative to Mcoln1−/− samples (Fig. 2C), suggesting that Mcoln1 loss actuates specific changes in oligodendrocyte maturation rather than the loss of entire cell populations. The relative abundance of Mbp and Mobp mRNA decreased between P21 and P60 (Fig. 2A,B), whereas levels of Mag mRNA continued to grow (Fig. 2C). These data are compatible with other published results (Ehmann et al., 2013). The observation that the expression of all three maturation markers was lower in the Mcoln1−/− cortices compared with Mcoln1+/+ cortices demonstrates early myelination delays (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Delayed oligodendrocyte maturation in the Mcoln1−/− cerebral cortex. (A-D) qPCR analysis of cerebrum (P1) and cortex (P10, P21 and P60) of Mcoln1+/+ and Mcoln1−/− littermate mice, showing expression of the mature oligodendrocyte markers Mobp, Mbp and Mag (A-C) and oligodendrocyte precursor marker Ng2 (D). The analysis was performed using the ΔΔCt method; Actb was used as a housekeeping gene. Slopes were obtained using simple linear regression, all of which were significant except WT in D. **P<0.005 and *P<0.05 using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison tests; n=3-5; ns, P>0.05; error bars represent s.e.m.

To answer whether the observed delays in the acquisition of the mature oligodendrocyte gene expression in the cortex are the result of delayed oligodendrocyte maturation or caused by loss of oligodendrocytes precursors, we analyzed the expression of the oligodendrocyte precursor marker neural/glial antigen 2 (Ng2; also known as Cspg4) (Hill et al., 2014). Interestingly, we found that expression of Ng2 increased in the Mcoln1−/− cortices compared with Mcoln1+/+ cortices (Fig. 2D). Increase in Ng2 expression might reflect the attempt to overcome the downstream myelination deficits during the active phase of brain myelination in postnatal development. Therefore, we conclude that brain hypomyelination in MLIV is caused by delayed oligodendrocyte maturation and reduced myelin production rather than the death of the oligodendrocyte precursors.

Next, we used immunohistochemistry to analyze developmental myelination of the corpus callosum in 10-day-old Mcoln1+/+ and Mcoln1−/− mice using antibodies for the mature oligodendrocyte marker myelin proteolipid protein (PLP1) (Wang et al., 2006), one of the most abundant proteins in the myelin, and the neuronal neurofilament marker SMI312 (Vasung et al., 2011) (Fig. 3). Previously, we reported that thinning of the corpus callosum in 2- and 7-month-old Mcoln1−/− mice, while the thickness of the underlying neuronal fibers in the corpus callosum remained intact, was caused by defective myelination (Grishchuk et al., 2015). Similar to these observations made in adult mice, we here detect no significant decrease in the SMI312-positive area of the corpus callosum in P10 pups, representing the normally forming tract of the callosal neuronal fibers, but observed a significant decrease in myelin deposition by mature oligodendrocytes, demonstrated by reduced PLP1-positive area alone and decreased ratio of the PLP1-positive area to the corresponding SMI312-positive area (Fig. 3A,B). Furthermore, we observed the irregular distribution of PLP1-positive cells and forming myelinated fibers in the Mcoln1−/− cortex, the islands of tissue that are devoid of the PLP1 staining (Fig. 3C and arrows in A), further supporting defective maturation of oligodendrocyte precursors in this model.

Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

Reduced myelination of the corpus callosum in the MLIV mouse model is not accompanied by significant reduction in neuronal fiber thickness. (A) Representative images of Mcoln1+/+ and Mcoln1−/− P10 brain sections stained with the mature oligodendrocyte/myelin marker PLP1 (red) and neuronal filament marker SMI312 (green). Corpus callosum and cortical areas are shown. Arrows show oligodendrocyte-deficient lesions in the Mcoln1−/− brain. Scale bar: 1 μm. (B) Analysis of the corpus callosum area identified via either PLP1 or SMI312 staining, showing reduction of the PLP1-positive but not SMA312-positive area and significant reduction of the PLP1- to SMI312-positive area ratio in Mcoln1−/− mice, indicating deficient myelination but normal underlying structure in the forming corpus callosum in the MLIV mouse. n=4 (Mcoln1+/+) and n=6 (Mcoln1−/−); ***P<0.001 using unpaired Student's t-test; n.s, P>0.05; error bars represent s.e.m. (C) Enlarged representative images of the Mcoln1+/+ and Mcoln1−/− P10 brain sections immunostained for PLP1, showing dysmorphic myelinating fibers in the Mcoln1−/− brain. Scale bar: 200 nm.

Delayed maturation of oligodendrocytes in the Mcoln1−/− brain is region specific

To answer whether the impact of Mcoln1/TRPML1 loss on myelination is different in the cerebellum, we performed quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis on the cerebellar samples from P1-P60 mice. We found that the overall differences in expression of the mature oligodendrocyte maturation markers in Mcoln1−/− and control Mcoln1+/+ cerebella were not as pronounced as they were in the cortical samples (Fig. 4A). This qPCR analysis was also supported by immunohistochemistry, using which we detected no difference in the percentage of PLP1-positive area, nor in the counts of oligodendrocytes labeled by APC-CC1 (Fig. 4B,C), in Mcoln1−/− cerebella compared with Mcoln1+/+ cerebella. Therefore, the impact of Mcoln1/TRPML1 loss on oligodendrocyte maturation and myelination is brain-region specific; this should be taken into consideration when discussing the impact of MLIV and its treatment.

Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.

Cerebellar myelination is preserved in MLIV mice. (A) qPCR analysis of P1, P10, P21 and P60 cerebella from Mcoln1+/+ (WT) and Mcoln1−/− (KO) littermate mice, showing expression of the mature oligodendrocyte markers Mobp, Mbp and Mag. The analysis was performed using the ΔΔCt method; Actb was used as a housekeeping gene. ns, P>0.05 using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test; n=3-5; error bars represent s.e.m. (B) Representative images of the Mcoln1+/+ and Mcoln1−/− P10 brain sections stained with the mature oligodendrocyte/myelin marker PLP1 (red), oligodendrocyte marker APC-CC1 (green) and nuclear counterstain Nuc-Blue (blue). Scale bars: 500 nm (left), 100 nm (right). (C) Statistical analysis of the APC-CC1-positive cell counts per section (left) and PLP1-positive area (right) in the cerebellar sections show no significant changes between Mcoln1+/+ and Mcoln1−/− mice. n.s, P>0.05 using unpaired Student's t-test; n=4 (Mcoln1+/+) and n=5 (Mcoln1−/−).

Transcriptional analysis of the iron-regulated genes failed to reveal signs of iron depletion in the whole-cortical homogenates

Iron handling by the lysosomes has been shown to be impaired in Mcoln1/TRPML1-deficient cells and brain tissues (Coblentz et al., 2014; Dong et al., 2008; Grishchuk et al., 2015). Despite the existing evidence for iron involvement, the mechanism by which iron mishandling impacts Mcoln1/TRPML1-deficient cells is unclear. Iron uptake in many cell types is facilitated through receptor-mediated endocytosis and therefore its late events are handled by the endolysosomes (Todorich et al., 2009, 2011; Valerio, 2007). TRPML1 may be involved in this by transferring ferrous iron from the lysosomal lumen to the cytoplasm. It is, therefore, possible that Mcoln1/TRPML1 loss traps ferrous iron in the lysosomes, depriving the cytoplasm of iron and causing lysosomal oxidative stress. Importantly, cytoplasmic iron is key to oligodendrocyte maturation and myelin production as it is a co-factor in ATP production, which is highly important due to extremely high energy requirements of oligodendrocytes during myelination, and in the activity of key enzymes of lipid catabolism and biosynthesis required for myelin production (Todorich et al., 2009). Iron retention in the lysosome due to loss of Mcoln1/TRPML1 might therefore directly affect oligodendrocyte maturation by depriving the reactions of iron.

To answer whether Mcoln1/TRPML1 loss is associated with the depletion of the cytoplasmic iron, we analyzed the expression of the iron-regulated genes, such as transferrin receptor (Tfrc), hephaestin (Heph), ferritin heavy chain 1 (Fth1) and ferroportin (Fpn; also known as Slc40a1), by qPCR. All these genes are regulated by cytoplastic iron through Hif1α, Hif2α and other transcription factors involved in metal handling and oxidative stress (Acikyol et al., 2013; Li et al., 2013). qPCR showed no distinct difference between the WT and Mcoln1−/− samples (Fig. 5). We, therefore, conclude that whole-tissue transcriptomic analysis reports no brain-wide cytoplasmic iron depletion. Owing to the relatively low abundance of oligodendroglial mRNA in the whole-tissue samples, however, we cannot rule out whether dysregulation of these genes in Mcoln1−/− animals takes place only in oligodendrocytes and may be masked by the signal from more-abundant cell types.

Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.

Cytoplasmic iron markers in the MLIV mouse forebrain. (A-D) qPCR analysis of mRNA for cytoplasmic iron markers Tfrc (A), Heph (B), Fth1 (C) and Fpn (D) in the cerebrum (P1) and cortex (P10-P60) samples of WT (Mcoln1+/+) and Mcoln1−/− (KO) mice. The analysis was performed using the ΔΔCt method; Actb was used as a housekeeping gene. *P<0.05 using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparison test; n=3-5; ns, P>0.05; error bars represent s.e.m.

DISCUSSION

In the present study, we show that loss of the lysosomal channel TRPML1 is associated with delayed oligodendrocyte maturation leading to brain hypomyelination, which is a characteristic of both the MLIV mouse model and the human disease. A dramatically significant aspect of MLIV uncovered by these studies is the extremely early onset of the oligodendrocyte maturation delay, manifesting already by P10. Importantly, these early myelination deficits are not reflecting or causing underlying structural abnormalities of neuronal fibers or their loss. This is a key piece of information for designing MLIV treatments.

We have previously reported reduced myelination in Mcoln1−/− mice via expression analysis of oligodendrocyte markers MAG, MBP, MOBP and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR; also known as PDGFRB) in whole-brain homogenates at 10 days, 2 months and 7 months of age (Grishchuk et al., 2015). We also showed lower protein levels of the mature oligodendrocyte marker PLP1 in the Mcoln1−/− brain and reduced thickness of the PLP1-immunostained corpus callosum. Importantly, the neurofilament marker SMI312 remained unchanged in the early symptomatic Mcoln1−/− mice (2 months of age), showing normally formed neuronal fibers in the corpus callosum. In the present study, we tracked and compared oligodendrocyte maturation markers in the forebrain/cortex and cerebellum in Mcoln1−/− mice at 1, 10, 21 and 60 days after birth. We found dramatic differences between genotypes and brain regions. More specifically, while we report significant myelination deficits in the anterior regions (cortex, corpus callosum) of the Mcoln1−/− brain, myelination in the posterior brain (cerebellum) was normal. This regional and temporal pattern of myelination deficits in the Mcoln1−/− mouse, along with the time course of Mcoln1/TRPML1 expression in postnatal brain development, provides new insights into the role of the TRPML1 channel in the myelination process. It is well recognized that myelination progresses from caudal to rostral pathways and in the order of increasing complexity of brain function (Gerber et al., 2010; Purger et al., 2016), starting from the areas responsible for basic homeostatic functions (pons, cerebellum) and proceeding to the areas controlling more complex tasks (frontal cortex). In the mouse, deposition of myelin in the cerebellum starts in the deepest regions earlier than P6 and is largely accomplished by P23 (Purger et al., 2016). In the corpus callosum, the first myelinating cells are noticed on P9. In TRPML1-deficient brains, the regions that normally acquire myelination later in development are affected the most. Interestingly, we show that, in parallel with brain myelination, expression of TRPML1 steadily increases in the postnatal brain and is more prominent in the cortex at the final stage of the myelination process, indicating its need for myelination of the higher-hierarchical regions.

In corroboration with our findings in Mcoln1−/− KO mice, specific abnormalities in cerebral white matter have been observed in MLIV patients. In a cross-sectional cohort analysis of 15 MLIV patients ranging in age from 16 months to 22 years (Frei et al., 1998), hypoplasia of the corpus callosum and elevated T2 signal in the subcortical white matter were reported in all patients, while cortical atrophy was only noted in two of the oldest (15 and 22 years). A subsequent prospective study of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) changes in five MLIV patients, ranging from 7 to 18 years of age, found increasing cortical gray matter and decreasing subcortical white-matter volumes across a 2- to 3-year follow-up period (Schiffmann et al., 2014). Although additional longitudinal data in individual patients are still needed to support conclusions, the available data in humans illustrate an early developmental defect followed by a late degenerative process specifically affecting white-matter tracts. The possibility that axonal degeneration could accompany white matter loss in MLIV patients was raised by the finding of decreased N-acetylaspartate (NAA)/creatine or choline ratios in multiple cortical regions (Bonavita et al., 2003; Cambron et al., 2012). Decreased NAA levels, however, can be seen in the setting of neuronal mitochondrial dysfunction without neuronal degeneration. Taken together with our current findings, we propose that the neurological deficits observed in the Mcoln1 KO mice and MLIV patients mainly arise from abnormalities in CNS white matter.

Our findings in Mcoln1−/− mice have important implications for understanding the disease pathogenesis in MLIV patients, for whom data on the earliest stages of myelination are not available. In regards to myelination, P10 in mice is roughly equivalent to the full-term human neonate (Hagberg et al., 2002; Semple et al., 2013). While corpus callosum hypoplasia/dysgenesis and subcortical white-matter abnormalities have consistently been reported in older individuals (Frei et al., 1998), brain MRI data for MLIV patients younger than 16 months of age have not been reported, largely due to the first symptoms presenting around 6 months of age and diagnosis rarely occurring before the first year. The delayed manifestation of motoric dysfunction in MLIV patients might reflect selective myelination deficit in higher-cortical regions. This is also supported by the fact that in the first months of life (prior to MLIV symptom onset) motor function is mostly attributable to primitive brain regions, where, based on our mouse data, myelination is not affected by the loss of Mcoln1/TRPML1.

Our understanding of leukodystrophies, genetically determined disorders that selectively affect white matter in the CNS, has rapidly evolved with the recent application of brain imaging techniques paired with next-generation sequencing (van der Knaap and Bugiani, 2017). Surprisingly, mutations in myelin- or oligodendrocyte-specific proteins are only responsible for a portion of clinically discernible leukodystrophies, while genes important for housekeeping processes in multiple cell linages are largely responsible for the remainder. As a result, the new extended classification of the leukodystrophies now includes more than 50 genetic syndromes with mutations in myelin- or oligodendrocyte-specific genes (hypomyelinating and demyelinating leukodystrophies; leukodystrophies with myelin vacuolization), and other white-matter components including axons (leuko-axonopathies), glia (astrocytopathies and microgliopathies) and blood vessels (leukovasculopathies). We believe that the prominent and early involvement of developmental hypomyelination strongly advocates for MLIV to be included to this list.

At the cellular level, TRPML1 has been shown to be involved in various cell functions including membrane fission and fusion, as well as the redistribution of ions between the lysosomes and the cytoplasm (Cheng et al., 2014; Dong et al., 2008; Eichelsdoerfer et al., 2010; Kukic et al., 2013; Miao et al., 2015; Samie et al., 2013; Soyombo et al., 2006; Venkatachalam et al., 2008; Wong et al., 2012; Xu and Ren, 2015; Xu et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2012). The latter effects were or can be attributed to TRPML1 iron conductance, or its role in the traffic of iron or iron-bound proteins in the endocytic pathway. Impairment of TRPML1-dependent iron uptake is an attractive hypothesis for the oligodendrocyte maturation deficits in the MLIV brain, as cytoplasmic iron is a key co-factor of the myelin synthesis pathway (Todorich et al., 2009). Indeed, iron deficiency and abnormal cellular iron absorption are associated with hypomyelination (Morath and Mayer-Pröschel, 2001; Todorich et al., 2009, 2011). Iron handling deficits have been reported by us in the brain of the Mcoln1−/− mouse model (Grishchuk et al., 2015). At that time, we were unable to provide a definitive answer regarding the impact of iron mishandling in the Mcoln1−/− brain. Here, we extended our studies using a battery of iron-reporter genes but found no evidence of the cytoplasmic iron deficit in the Mcoln1−/− cortical tissue homogenates. We, therefore, conclude that iron mishandling caused by Mcoln1/TRPML1 loss is either (1) limited to a specific subset of cells (such as mature oligodendrocytes) and being masked in the whole-tissue preparations, (2) taking place at certain developmental stages, and/or (3) only manifesting as a lysosomal iron buildup without significantly affecting the cytoplasmic iron uptake and therefore unable to be detected via analysis of expression of the iron-related genes. To this end, isolated Mcoln1−/− oligodendrocyte cultures and co-cultures with neurons and glia will be instrumental in delineating the mechanism by directly measuring cytosolic iron reporters, lysosomal iron content, oxidative stress and their impact on myelination, and will be the focus of our future study.

In conclusion, we present evidence of the role of the TRPML1 lysosomal channel in developmental myelination. Genetic ablation of TRPML1 leads to deficient oligodendrocyte maturation, resulting in hypomyelination of the cortex and corpus callosum already noticeable at P10. However, mechanisms of how the loss of TRPML1 leads to such deficits remain unknown. Brain myelination in development is a complex and highly regulated process that depends on both cell-intrinsic (oligodendroglial) and -extrinsic (neuronal, astrocytic and microglial) signaling and cues. Indeed, reduced myelination in the early-postnatal Mcoln1−/− cortex is accompanied by the observations of robust activation of astrocytes, resulting in elevated cytokine/chemokine release and neuroinflammation (Weinstock et al., 2018). Therefore, better understanding of the role of TRPML1 in oligodendrocyte maturation and myelin deposition will require new genetic in vivo (using the Cre-LoxP system for cell-type-specific manipulation of Mcoln1 expression) and in vitro oligodendrocyte and other brain cell co-culture models and this will be the scope of our future investigations. Elucidating the involvement of other brain cell types, neurons and glia, affected by the loss of TRPML1 in the development of the oligodendrocyte lineage cells is important, given the complex picture of brain pathology and dysfunction in this disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals

Mcoln1 KO mice were maintained and genotyped as previously described (Venugopal et al., 2007). The Mcoln1+/− breeders for this study were obtained by backcrossing onto a C57Bl6J background for more than ten generations. Mcoln1+/+ littermates were used as controls. Experiments were performed according to the institutional and National Institutes of Health guidelines and approved by the Massachusetts General Hospital Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Immunohistochemistry and image analysis

To obtain brain tissue for histological examination 1-, 10-, 21- and 60-day-old Mcoln1−/− and control mice were sacrificed using a carbon dioxide chamber. Immediately after, they were transcardially perfused with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Brains were post-fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 48 h, washed with PBS, cryoprotected in 30% sucrose in PBS for 24 h, split into cerebrum and cerebellum, frozen in isopentane and stored at −80°C. Brains were bisected along the midline and one hemisphere was examined histologically. Coronal sections of the cerebrum and sagittal sections of the cerebellum were cut at 10 μm using a cryostat. Sections were mounted onto glass SuperFrost plus slides. These sections were stored at −20°C before any staining procedures. For PLP1 and SMI312 staining, sections were microwaved in citrate buffer (10 mM citric acid, 0.05% Tween 20, pH 6.0) at low power for 18 min for antigen retrieval, blocked in 0.5% Triton X-100 and 5% normal goat serum (NGS) in PBS and incubated with primary antibodies diluted in 1% NGS overnight. The following primary antibodies were used: PLP1 rabbit polyclonal (1:500; ab28486) and SMI312 (pan axonal neurofilament) mouse monoclonal (1:1000; ab24574), both from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA). Sections were incubated with secondary antibodies in 1% NGS for 1.5 h at room temperature. The following secondary antibodies were used: donkey anti-mouse AlexaFluor 488 and donkey anti-rabbit AlexaFluor 555 (1:500; Invitrogen, Eugene, OR, USA). For APC-CC1 staining no antigen retrieval was performed. After blocking, sections were incubated with anti-APC-CC1 antibody (mouse monoclonal; 1:100; OP80, Calbiochem, Billerica, MA, USA), followed by goat anti-mouse AlexaFluor 488 (1:500; Invitrogen). Sections were counterstained with NucBlue nuclear stain (Life Technologies, Eugene, OR, USA).

Images were acquired on DM8i Leica Inverted Epifluorescence Microscope with Adaptive Focus (Leica Microsystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA) with Hamamatsu Flash 4.0 camera and advanced acquisition software package MetaMorph 4.2 (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA) using an automated stitching function. The exposure time was kept constant for all sections (WT and Mcoln1−/− sections within the same immunohistochemistry experiment). Image analysis was performed using Fiji software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). Areas of interest were selected in each section. Area and mean pixel intensity values were compared between genotypes using GraphPad Prism 7.04 software (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA) using unpaired Student's t-test. Gaussian distribution was tested using the Shapiro–Wilk normality test.

RNA extraction and qRT-PCR

For qRT-PCR experiments, total RNA was extracted from whole cerebra or dissected cerebella from P1 pups. Whole-cerebella and cortical samples from the brains of 10-day-, 21-day- and 2-month-old mice were used. Cortical samples were dissected to include motor and somatosensory areas and did not contain corpus callosum tissue. RNA was extracted using TRizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer's protocol. All experimental groups were designed to contain at least four animals per genotype and time point; lower numbers in some conditions were due to low mRNA yields that prevented them being included in qRT-PCR experiments. For complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis, MuLV Reverse Transcriptase (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) was used with 2 μg total RNA and oligo(dT)18 (IDT, Coralville, IA, USA) as a primer. qRT-PCR was carried out using 1:75 dilutions of cDNA, 2× SYBR Green/ROX Master Mix (Fermentas, Glen Burnie, MD, USA) and 4 μM primer mix per 10 μl reaction. For gene expression analysis, the following primers were used (IDT, Coralville, IA, USA): Actb, forward 5′-GCTCCGGCATGTGCAAAG-3′ and reverse 5′-CATCACACCCTGGTGCCTA-3′; Fpn, forward 5′-ATCCTCTGCGGAATCATCCT-3′ and reverse 5′-CAGACAGTAAGGACCCATCCA-3′; Fth1, forward 5′-TGATCCCCACTTATGTGACTTCAT-3′ and reverse 5′-ACGTGGTCACCCAGTTCTTT-3′; Heph, forward 5′-ACTAAAGAGATTGGAAAAGCAGTGA-3′ and reverse 5′-TCATGCCCAGCATCTTCACA-3′; Mag, forward 5′-CGGGATTGTCACTGAGAGC-3′ and reverse 5′-AGGTCCAGTTCTGGGGATTC-3′; Mbp, forward 5′-GTGCCACATGTACAAGGACT-3′ and reverse 5′-TGGGTTTTCATCTTGGGTCC-3′; Mobp, forward 5′-CACCCTTCACCTTCCTCAAC-3′ and reverse 5′-TTCTGGTAAAAGCAACCGCT-3′; Ng2, forward 5′-CATTTCTTCCGAGTGGTGGC-3′ and reverse 5′-CACAGACTCTGGACAGACGG-3′; Tfrc, forward 5′- GAGGCGCTTCCTAGTACTCC-3′ and reverse 5′-TGGTTCCCCACCAAACAAGT-3′.

To avoid amplification of genomic DNA and ensure amplification of cDNA, all primers were designed to span exons and negative reverse transcription reactions (without reverse transcriptase) were performed as a control. Samples were amplified in triplicate on a 7300 Real-Time System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using the following program: 2 min at 50°C, 10 min at 95°C, and 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 s followed by 1 min at 60°C. In addition, a dissociation curve step was run to corroborate that amplification with specific primers resulting in one product only. The ΔΔCt method was used to calculate relative gene expression, where Ct corresponds to the cycle threshold. Ct values for a representative set of genes are plotted in Fig. S2. ΔCt values were calculated as the difference between Ct values from the target gene and the housekeeping gene Actb. Experiments were performed double blind using numerically coded samples; the sample identity was disclosed at the final stage of data analysis. Data are presented as fold change.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Franca Cambi for fruitful discussions.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    The authors declare no competing or financial interests.

  • Author contributions

    Conceptualization: S.A.S., Y.G., K.K.; Methodology: S.H., Y.G., K.K.; Formal analysis: L.A., Y.G., K.K.; Investigation: M.M., L.A., J.S., S.S., S.H., S.D., Y.G., K.K.; Data curation: Y.G., K.K.; Writing - original draft: A.M., Y.G., K.K.; Writing - review & editing: A.M., Y.G., K.K.; Supervision: S.A.S., Y.G., K.K.; Funding acquisition: S.A.S., Y.G., K.K.

  • Funding

    This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01NS096755).

  • Supplementary information

    Supplementary information available online at https://dmm.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/dmm.044230.supplemental

  • Received January 27, 2020.
  • Accepted June 16, 2020.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Abraham, F. A.,
    2. Brand, N.,
    3. Blumenthal, M. and
    4. Merin, S.
    (1985). Retinal function in mucolipidosis IV. Ophthalmologica 191, 210-214. doi:10.1159/000309589
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Acierno, J. S., Jr.,
    2. Kennedy, J. C.,
    3. Falardeau, J. L.,
    4. Leyne, M.,
    5. Bromley, M. C.,
    6. Colman, M. W.,
    7. Sun, M.,
    8. Bove, C.,
    9. Ashworth, L. K.,
    10. Chadwick, L. H. et al.
    (2001). A physical and transcript map of the MCOLN1 gene region on human chromosome 19p13.3-p13.2. Genomics 73, 203-210. doi:10.1006/geno.2001.6526
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Acikyol, B.,
    2. Graham, R. M.,
    3. Trinder, D.,
    4. House, M. J.,
    5. Olynyk, J. K.,
    6. Scott, R. J.,
    7. Milward, E. A. and
    8. Johnstone, D. M.
    (2013). Brain transcriptome perturbations in the transferrin receptor 2 mutant mouse support the case for brain changes in iron loading disorders, including effects relating to long-term depression and long-term potentiation. Neuroscience 235, 119-128. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.01.014
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Altarescu, G.,
    2. Sun, M.,
    3. Moore, D. F.,
    4. Smith, J. A.,
    5. Wiggs, E. A.,
    6. Solomon, B. I.,
    7. Patronas, N. J.,
    8. Frei, K. P.,
    9. Gupta, S.,
    10. Kaneski, C. R. et al.
    (2002). The neurogenetics of mucolipidosis type IV. Neurology 59, 306-313. doi:10.1212/WNL.59.3.306
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Bargal, R.,
    2. Avidan, N.,
    3. Ben-Asher, E.,
    4. Olender, Z.,
    5. Zeigler, M.,
    6. Frumkin, A.,
    7. Raas-Rothschild, A.,
    8. Glusman, G.,
    9. Lancet, D. and
    10. Bach, G.
    (2000). Identification of the gene causing mucolipidosis type IV. Nat. Genet. 26, 118-123. doi:10.1038/79095
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Berman, E. R.,
    2. Livni, N.,
    3. Shapira, E.,
    4. Merin, S. and
    5. Levij, I. S.
    (1974). Congenital corneal clouding with abnormal systemic storage bodies: a new variant of mucolipidosis. J. Pediatr. 84, 519-526. doi:10.1016/S0022-3476(74)80671-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Bonavita, S.,
    2. Virta, A.,
    3. Jeffries, N.,
    4. Goldin, E.,
    5. Tedeschi, G. and
    6. Schiffmann, R.
    (2003). Diffuse neuroaxonal involvement in mucolipidosis IV as assessed by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. J. Child Neurol. 18, 443-449. doi:10.1177/08830738030180070701
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Cambron, M.,
    2. D'Haeseleer, M.,
    3. Laureys, G.,
    4. Clinckers, R.,
    5. Debruyne, J. and
    6. De Keyser, J.
    (2012). White-matter astrocytes, axonal energy metabolism, and axonal degeneration in multiple sclerosis. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 32, 413-424. doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2011.193
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Chandra, M.,
    2. Zhou, H.,
    3. Li, Q.,
    4. Muallem, S.,
    5. Hofmann, S. L. and
    6. Soyombo, A. A.
    (2011). A role for the Ca2+ channel TRPML1 in gastric acid secretion, based on analysis of knockout mice. Gastroenterology 140, 857-867. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2010.11.040
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Cheng, X.,
    2. Zhang, X.,
    3. Gao, Q.,
    4. Ali Samie, M.,
    5. Azar, M.,
    6. Tsang, W. L.,
    7. Dong, L.,
    8. Sahoo, N.,
    9. Li, X.,
    10. Zhuo, Y. et al.
    (2014). The intracellular Ca(2)(+) channel MCOLN1 is required for sarcolemma repair to prevent muscular dystrophy. Nat. Med. 20, 1187-1192. doi:10.1038/nm.3611
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Coblentz, J.,
    2. St Croix, C. and
    3. Kiselyov, K.
    (2014). Loss of TRPML1 promotes production of reactive oxygen species: is oxidative damage a factor in mucolipidosis type IV? Biochem. J. 457, 361-368. doi:10.1042/BJ20130647
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Colletti, G. A.,
    2. Miedel, M. T.,
    3. Quinn, J.,
    4. Andharia, N.,
    5. Weisz, O. A. and
    6. Kiselyov, K.
    (2012). Loss of lysosomal ion channel transient receptor potential channel mucolipin-1 (TRPML1) leads to cathepsin B-dependent apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 8082-8091. doi:10.1074/jbc.M111.285536
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Dong, X.-P.,
    2. Cheng, X.,
    3. Mills, E.,
    4. Delling, M.,
    5. Wang, F.,
    6. Kurz, T. and
    7. Xu, H.
    (2008). The type IV mucolipidosis-associated protein TRPML1 is an endolysosomal iron release channel. Nature 455, 992-996. doi:10.1038/nature07311
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    1. Ehmann, H.,
    2. Hartwich, H.,
    3. Salzig, C.,
    4. Hartmann, N.,
    5. Clément-Ziza, M.,
    6. Ushakov, K.,
    7. Avraham, K. B.,
    8. Bininda-Emonds, O. R.,
    9. Hartmann, A. K.,
    10. Lang, P. et al.
    (2013). Time-dependent gene expression analysis of the developing superior olivary complex. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 25865-25879. doi:10.1074/jbc.M113.490508
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Eichelsdoerfer, J. L.,
    2. Evans, J. A.,
    3. Slaugenhaupt, S. A. and
    4. Cuajungco, M. P.
    (2010). Zinc dyshomeostasis is linked with the loss of mucolipidosis IV-associated TRPML1 ion channel. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 34304-34308. doi:10.1074/jbc.C110.165480
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Frei, K. P.,
    2. Patronas, N. J.,
    3. Crutchfield, K. E.,
    4. Altarescu, G. and
    5. Schiffmann, R.
    (1998). Mucolipidosis type IV: characteristic MRI findings. Neurology 51, 565-569. doi:10.1212/WNL.51.2.565
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Gerber, S.,
    2. Tasdizen, T.,
    3. Thomas Fletcher, P.,
    4. Joshi, S.,
    5. Whitaker, R. and
    6. Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging, I.
    (2010). Manifold modeling for brain population analysis. Med. Image Anal. 14, 643-653. doi:10.1016/j.media.2010.05.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Grishchuk, Y.,
    2. Sri, S.,
    3. Rudinskiy, N.,
    4. Ma, W.,
    5. Stember, K. G.,
    6. Cottle, M. W.,
    7. Sapp, E.,
    8. Difiglia, M.,
    9. Muzikansky, A.,
    10. Betensky, R. A. et al.
    (2014). Behavioral deficits, early gliosis, dysmyelination and synaptic dysfunction in a mouse model of mucolipidosis IV. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2, 133. doi:10.1186/s40478-014-0133-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Grishchuk, Y.,
    2. Peña, K. A.,
    3. Coblentz, J.,
    4. King, V. E.,
    5. Humphrey, D. M.,
    6. Wang, S. L.,
    7. Kiselyov, K. I. and
    8. Slaugenhaupt, S. A.
    (2015). Impaired myelination and reduced brain ferric iron in the mouse model of mucolipidosis IV. Dis. Model. Mech. 8, 1591-1601. doi:10.1242/dmm.021154
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Grishchuk, Y.,
    2. Stember, K. G.,
    3. Matsunaga, A.,
    4. Olivares, A. M.,
    5. Cruz, N. M.,
    6. King, V. E.,
    7. Humphrey, D. M.,
    8. Wang, S. L.,
    9. Muzikansky, A.,
    10. Betensky, R. A. et al.
    (2016). Retinal dystrophy and optic nerve pathology in the mouse model of Mucolipidosis IV. Am. J. Pathol. 186, 199-209. doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.09.017
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. ↵
    1. Ha, T. J.,
    2. Zhang, P. G. Y.,
    3. Robert, R.,
    4. Yeung, J.,
    5. Swanson, D. J.,
    6. Mathelier, A.,
    7. Wasserman, W. W.,
    8. Im, S.,
    9. Itoh, M.,
    10. Kawaji, H. et al.
    (2019). Identification of novel cerebellar developmental transcriptional regulators with motif activity analysis. BMC Genomics 20, 718. doi:10.1186/s12864-019-6063-9
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    1. Hagberg, H.,
    2. Ichord, R.,
    3. Palmer, C.,
    4. Yager, J. Y. and
    5. Vannucci, S. J.
    (2002). Animal models of developmental brain injury: relevance to human disease. a summary of the panel discussion from the third Hershey conference on developmental cerebral blood flow and metabolism. Dev. Neurosci. 24, 364-366. doi:10.1159/000069040
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Han, H.,
    2. Myllykoski, M.,
    3. Ruskamo, S.,
    4. Wang, C. and
    5. Kursula, P.
    (2013). Myelin-specific proteins: a structurally diverse group of membrane-interacting molecules. Biofactors 39, 233-241. doi:10.1002/biof.1076
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Hill, R. A.,
    2. Patel, K. D.,
    3. Goncalves, C. M.,
    4. Grutzendler, J. and
    5. Nishiyama, A.
    (2014). Modulation of oligodendrocyte generation during a critical temporal window after NG2 cell division. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 1518-1527. doi:10.1038/nn.3815
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Huang, H.,
    2. Zhao, X.-F.,
    3. Zheng, K. and
    4. Qiu, M.
    (2013). Regulation of the timing of oligodendrocyte differentiation: mechanisms and perspectives. Neurosci. Bull. 29, 155-164. doi:10.1007/s12264-013-1314-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Jennings, J. J., Jr.,
    2. Zhu, J.-H.,
    3. Rbaibi, Y.,
    4. Luo, X.,
    5. Chu, C. T. and
    6. Kiselyov, K.
    (2006). Mitochondrial aberrations in mucolipidosis Type IV. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 39041-39050. doi:10.1074/jbc.M607982200
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Jung, J.,
    2. Cho, K. J.,
    3. Naji, A. K.,
    4. Clemons, K. N.,
    5. Wong, C. O.,
    6. Villanueva, M.,
    7. Gregory, S.,
    8. Karagas, N. E.,
    9. Tan, L.,
    10. Liang, H. et al.
    (2019). HRAS-driven cancer cells are vulnerable to TRPML1 inhibition. EMBO Rep. 20, e46685. doi:10.15252/embr.201846685
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Kukic, I.,
    2. Lee, J. K.,
    3. Coblentz, J.,
    4. Kelleher, S. L. and
    5. Kiselyov, K.
    (2013). Zinc-dependent lysosomal enlargement in TRPML1-deficient cells involves MTF-1 transcription factor and ZnT4 (Slc30a4) transporter. Biochem. J. 451, 155-163. doi:10.1042/BJ20121506
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Li, Y.,
    2. Guan, Q.,
    3. Chen, Y.,
    4. Han, H.,
    5. Liu, W. and
    6. Nie, Z.
    (2013). Transferrin receptor and ferritin-H are developmentally regulated in oligodendrocyte lineage cells. Neural. Regen. Res. 8, 6-12.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Li, X.,
    2. Rydzewski, N.,
    3. Hider, A.,
    4. Zhang, X.,
    5. Yang, J.,
    6. Wang, W.,
    7. Gao, Q.,
    8. Cheng, X. and
    9. Xu, H.
    (2016). A molecular mechanism to regulate lysosome motility for lysosome positioning and tubulation. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 404-417. doi:10.1038/ncb3324
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Lizio, M.,
    2. Harshbarger, J.,
    3. Shimoji, H.,
    4. Severin, J.,
    5. Kasukawa, T.,
    6. Sahin, S.,
    7. Abugessaisa, I.,
    8. Fukuda, S.,
    9. Hori, F.,
    10. Ishikawa-Kato, S. et al.
    (2015). Gateways to the FANTOM5 promoter level mammalian expression atlas. Genome Biol. 16, 22. doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0560-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Miao, Y.,
    2. Li, G.,
    3. Zhang, X.,
    4. Xu, H. and
    5. Abraham, S. N.
    (2015). A TRP channel senses lysosome neutralization by pathogens to trigger their expulsion. Cell 161, 1306-1319. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Micsenyi, M. C.,
    2. Dobrenis, K.,
    3. Stephney, G.,
    4. Pickel, J.,
    5. Vanier, M. T.,
    6. Slaugenhaupt, S. A. and
    7. Walkley, S. U.
    (2009). Neuropathology of the Mcoln1(−/−) knockout mouse model of mucolipidosis type IV. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 68, 125-135. doi:10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181942cf0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Miedel, M. T.,
    2. Rbaibi, Y.,
    3. Guerriero, C. J.,
    4. Colletti, G.,
    5. Weixel, K. M.,
    6. Weisz, O. A. and
    7. Kiselyov, K.
    (2008). Membrane traffic and turnover in TRP-ML1-deficient cells: a revised model for mucolipidosis type IV pathogenesis. J. Exp. Med. 205, 1477-1490. doi:10.1084/jem.20072194
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Morath, D. J. and
    2. Mayer-Pröschel, M.
    (2001). Iron modulates the differentiation of a distinct population of glial precursor cells into oligodendrocytes. Dev. Biol. 237, 232-243. doi:10.1006/dbio.2001.0352
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    1. Noguchi, S.,
    2. Arakawa, T.,
    3. Fukuda, S.,
    4. Furuno, M.,
    5. Hasegawa, A.,
    6. Hori, F.,
    7. Ishikawa-Kato, S.,
    8. Kaida, K.,
    9. Kaiho, A.,
    10. Kanamori-Katayama, M. et al.
    (2017). FANTOM5 CAGE profiles of human and mouse samples. Sci. Data 4, 170112. doi:10.1038/sdata.2017.112
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Pérez, M. J.,
    2. Fernandez, N. and
    3. Pasquini, J. M.
    (2013). Oligodendrocyte differentiation and signaling after transferrin internalization: a mechanism of action. Exp. Neurol. 248, 262-274. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2013.06.014
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Purger, D.,
    2. Gibson, E. M. and
    3. Monje, M.
    (2016). Myelin plasticity in the central nervous system. Neuropharmacology 110, 563-573. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.08.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Raas-Rothschild, A.,
    2. Bargal, R.,
    3. DellaPergola, S.,
    4. Zeigler, M. and
    5. Bach, G.
    (1999). Mucolipidosis type IV: the origin of the disease in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 7, 496-498. doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200277
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Riedel, K. G.,
    2. Zwaan, J.,
    3. Kenyon, K. R.,
    4. Kolodny, E. H.,
    5. Hanninen, L. and
    6. Albert, D. M.
    (1985). Ocular abnormalities in mucolipidosis IV. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 99, 125-136. doi:10.1016/0002-9394(85)90220-X
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. ↵
    1. Robinson, A. P.,
    2. Rodgers, J. M.,
    3. Goings, G. E. and
    4. Miller, S. D.
    (2014). Characterization of oligodendroglial populations in mouse demyelinating disease using flow cytometry: clues for MS pathogenesis. PLoS ONE 9, e107649. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0107649
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Samie, M.,
    2. Wang, X.,
    3. Zhang, X.,
    4. Goschka, A.,
    5. Li, X.,
    6. Cheng, X.,
    7. Gregg, E.,
    8. Azar, M.,
    9. Zhuo, Y.,
    10. Garrity, A. G. et al.
    (2013). A TRP channel in the lysosome regulates large particle phagocytosis via focal exocytosis. Dev. Cell 26, 511-524. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2013.08.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. ↵
    1. Schiffmann, R.,
    2. Dwyer, N. K.,
    3. Lubensky, I. A.,
    4. Tsokos, M.,
    5. Sutliff, V. E.,
    6. Latimer, J. S.,
    7. Frei, K. P.,
    8. Brady, R. O.,
    9. Barton, N. W.,
    10. Blanchette-Mackie, E. J. et al.
    (1998). Constitutive achlorhydria in mucolipidosis type IV. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 1207-1212. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.3.1207
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Schiffmann, R.,
    2. Mayfield, J.,
    3. Swift, C. and
    4. Nestrasil, I.
    (2014). Quantitative neuroimaging in mucolipidosis type IV. Mol. Genet. Metab. 111, 147-151. doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2013.11.007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Semple, B. D.,
    2. Blomgren, K.,
    3. Gimlin, K.,
    4. Ferriero, D. M. and
    5. Noble-Haeusslein, L. J.
    (2013). Brain development in rodents and humans: Identifying benchmarks of maturation and vulnerability to injury across species. Prog. Neurobiol. 106-107, 1-16. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.04.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Slaugenhaupt, S. A.,
    2. Acierno, J. S., Jr.,
    3. Helbling, L. A.,
    4. Bove, C.,
    5. Goldin, E.,
    6. Bach, G.,
    7. Schiffmann, R. and
    8. Gusella, J. F.
    (1999). Mapping of the mucolipidosis type IV gene to chromosome 19p and definition of founder haplotypes. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 65, 773-778. doi:10.1086/302549
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. ↵
    1. Soyombo, A. A.,
    2. Tjon-Kon-Sang, S.,
    3. Rbaibi, Y.,
    4. Bashllari, E.,
    5. Bisceglia, J.,
    6. Muallem, S. and
    7. Kiselyov, K.
    (2006). TRP-ML1 regulates lysosomal pH and acidic lysosomal lipid hydrolytic activity. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 7294-7301. doi:10.1074/jbc.M508211200
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    1. Todorich, B.,
    2. Pasquini, J. M.,
    3. Garcia, C. I.,
    4. Paez, P. M. and
    5. Connor, J. R.
    (2009). Oligodendrocytes and myelination: the role of iron. Glia 57, 467-478. doi:10.1002/glia.20784
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. ↵
    1. Todorich, B.,
    2. Zhang, X. and
    3. Connor, J. R.
    (2011). H-ferritin is the major source of iron for oligodendrocytes. Glia 59, 927-935. doi:10.1002/glia.21164
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Valerio, L. G.
    (2007). Mammalian iron metabolism. Toxicol. Mech. Methods 17, 497-517. doi:10.1080/15376510701556690
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. van der Knaap, M. S. and
    2. Bugiani, M.
    (2017). Leukodystrophies: a proposed classification system based on pathological changes and pathogenetic mechanisms. Acta Neuropathol. 134, 351-382. doi:10.1007/s00401-017-1739-1
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  52. ↵
    1. Vasung, L.,
    2. Jovanov-Milošević, N.,
    3. Pletikos, M.,
    4. Mori, S.,
    5. Judaš, M. and
    6. Kostović, I.
    (2011). Prominent periventricular fiber system related to ganglionic eminence and striatum in the human fetal cerebrum. Brain Struct. Funct. 215, 237-253. doi:10.1007/s00429-010-0279-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. ↵
    1. Venkatachalam, K.,
    2. Long, A. A.,
    3. Elsaesser, R.,
    4. Nikolaeva, D.,
    5. Broadie, K. and
    6. Montell, C.
    (2008). Motor deficit in a Drosophila model of mucolipidosis type IV due to defective clearance of apoptotic cells. Cell 135, 838-851. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.041
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. ↵
    1. Venugopal, B.,
    2. Browning, M. F.,
    3. Curcio-Morelli, C.,
    4. Varro, A.,
    5. Michaud, N.,
    6. Nanthakumar, N.,
    7. Walkley, S. U.,
    8. Pickel, J. and
    9. Slaugenhaupt, S. A.
    (2007). Neurologic, gastric, and opthalmologic pathologies in a murine model of mucolipidosis type IV. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 1070-1083. doi:10.1086/521954
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  55. ↵
    1. Vergarajauregui, S.,
    2. Connelly, P. S.,
    3. Daniels, M. P. and
    4. Puertollano, R.
    (2008). Autophagic dysfunction in mucolipidosis type IV patients. Hum. Mol. Genet. 17, 2723-2737. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddn174
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  56. ↵
    1. Vitezic, M.,
    2. Bertin, N.,
    3. Andersson, R.,
    4. Lipovich, L.,
    5. Kawaji, H.,
    6. Lassmann, T.,
    7. Sandelin, A.,
    8. Heutink, P.,
    9. Goldowitz, D.,
    10. Ha, T. et al.
    (2014). CAGE-defined promoter regions of the genes implicated in Rett Syndrome. BMC Genomics 15, 1177. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-1177
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  57. ↵
    1. Wang, S.-Z.,
    2. Dulin, J.,
    3. Wu, H.,
    4. Hurlock, E.,
    5. Lee, S. E.,
    6. Jansson, K. and
    7. Lu, Q. R.
    (2006). An oligodendrocyte-specific zinc-finger transcription regulator cooperates with Olig2 to promote oligodendrocyte differentiation. Development 133, 3389-3398. doi:10.1242/dev.02522
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    1. Weinstock, L. D.,
    2. Furness, A. M.,
    3. Herron, S. S.,
    4. Smith, S. S.,
    5. Sankar, S. B.,
    6. DeRosa, S. G.,
    7. Gao, D.,
    8. Mepyans, M. E.,
    9. Scotto Rosato, A.,
    10. Medina, D. L. et al.
    (2018). Fingolimod phosphate inhibits astrocyte inflammatory activity in mucolipidosis IV. Hum. Mol. Genet. 27, 2725-2738. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddy182
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  59. ↵
    1. Wong, C.-O.,
    2. Li, R.,
    3. Montell, C. and
    4. Venkatachalam, K.
    (2012). Drosophila TRPML is required for TORC1 activation. Curr. Biol. 22, 1616-1621. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.055
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Xu, H. and
    2. Ren, D.
    (2015). Lysosomal physiology. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 77, 57-80. doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-021014-071649
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Xu, S.-Z.,
    2. Muraki, K.,
    3. Zeng, F.,
    4. Li, J.,
    5. Sukumar, P.,
    6. Shah, S.,
    7. Dedman, A. M.,
    8. Flemming, P. K.,
    9. McHugh, D.,
    10. Naylor, J. et al.
    (2006). A sphingosine-1-phosphate-activated calcium channel controlling vascular smooth muscle cell motility. Circ. Res. 98, 1381-1389. doi:10.1161/01.RES.0000225284.36490.a2
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. ↵
    1. Xu, M.,
    2. Almasi, S.,
    3. Yang, Y.,
    4. Yan, C.,
    5. Sterea, A. M.,
    6. Rizvi Syeda, A. K.,
    7. Shen, B.,
    8. Richard Derek, C.,
    9. Huang, P.,
    10. Gujar, S. et al.
    (2019). The lysosomal TRPML1 channel regulates triple negative breast cancer development by promoting mTORC1 and purinergic signaling pathways. Cell Calcium 79, 80-88. doi:10.1016/j.ceca.2019.02.010
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  63. ↵
    1. Yamaguchi, S.,
    2. Jha, A.,
    3. Li, Q.,
    4. Soyombo, A. A.,
    5. Dickinson, G. D.,
    6. Churamani, D.,
    7. Brailoiu, E.,
    8. Patel, S. and
    9. Muallem, S.
    (2011). Transient receptor potential mucolipin 1 (TRPML1) and two-pore channels are functionally independent organellar ion channels. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 22934-22942. doi:10.1074/jbc.M110.210930
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. ↵
    1. Zhang, X.,
    2. Li, X. and
    3. Xu, H.
    (2012). Phosphoinositide isoforms determine compartment-specific ion channel activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 11384-11389. doi:10.1073/pnas.1202194109
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. ↵
    1. Zhang, Y.,
    2. Chen, K.,
    3. Sloan, S. A.,
    4. Bennett, M. L.,
    5. Scholze, A. R.,
    6. O'Keeffe, S.,
    7. Phatnani, H. P.,
    8. Guarnieri, P.,
    9. Caneda, C.,
    10. Ruderisch, N. et al.
    (2014). An RNA-sequencing transcriptome and splicing database of glia, neurons, and vascular cells of the cerebral cortex. J. Neurosci. 34, 11929-11947. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1860-14.2014
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. ↵
    1. Zhang, X.,
    2. Cheng, X.,
    3. Yu, L.,
    4. Yang, J.,
    5. Calvo, R.,
    6. Patnaik, S.,
    7. Hu, X.,
    8. Gao, Q.,
    9. Yang, M.,
    10. Lawas, M. et al.
    (2016). MCOLN1 is a ROS sensor in lysosomes that regulates autophagy. Nat. Commun. 7, 12109. doi:10.1038/ncomms12109
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
Back to top

RSSRSS

Keywords

 Download PDF

Email
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Early evidence of delayed oligodendrocyte maturation in the mouse model of mucolipidosis type IV
Molly Mepyans, Livia Andrzejczuk, Jahree Sosa, Sierra Smith, Shawn Herron, Samantha DeRosa, Susan A. Slaugenhaupt, Albert Misko, Yulia Grishchuk, Kirill Kiselyov
Disease Models & Mechanisms 2020 13: dmm044230 doi: 10.1242/dmm.044230 Published 30 July 2020
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Alerts

Article navigation

Subject collections

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Advertisement

DMM and COVID-19

We are aware that the COVID-19 pandemic is having an unprecedented impact on researchers worldwide. The Editors of all The Company of Biologists’ journals have been considering ways in which we can alleviate concerns that members of our community may have around publishing activities during this time. Read about the actions we are taking at this time.

Please don’t hesitate to contact the Editorial Office if you have any questions or concerns.

Alessandro Bailetti is awarded the DMM Outstanding Paper Prize 2019

The annual prize is awarded to the first author of the paper that is judged by the journal’s editors to be the most outstanding contribution to the journal that year. Alessandro Bailetti's winning paper presents results that indicate a possible connection between E(Pc) and the Tip60 complex, and leukemia. Find out more about Alessandro and read the winning paper.

Find DMM online

We may not be meeting you in person this year, but we’re always here to chat about DMM and The Company of Biologists. Join the conversation over on Twitter, email us or catch Scientific Editor Julija Hmeljak at these upcoming virtual meetings:

MRC Human Genetics Unit (Virtual) Symposium: Aberrant Cell State Transitions in Human Disease
23-24 September

Genomic Imprinting – from Biology to Disease
28 September – 1 October

ZDMS Virtual webinar series
Throughout September – December

Interview - Mohd. Salman

First author Mohd. Salman studies traumatic brain injury. In an interview, he takes us through his latest research in DMM, explaining the potential implications of the findings, and discussing Wistar rats as a model system and life as a early-career researcher. 

Call for papers - The RAS Pathway: Diseases, Therapeutics and Beyond

DMM invites you to submit original research for a special issue focused on targeting the RAS pathway. The submission deadline is 1 March 2021. Find out more and showcase your breakthrough research in this special collection. 

It’s a time of turmoil for young scientists

“My students are my priority – they are on the brink of their careers.”

Dr Jodie Rummer (ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies at James Cook University) talks about the importance of her role as a supervisor in supporting graduate students and post docs financially, intellectually and emotionally during this period of uncertainty.