Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About DMM
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contact
    • Contact DMM
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Disease Models & Mechanisms
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Advanced search

RSS   Twitter   Facebook   YouTube

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About DMM
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contact
    • Contact DMM
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Deficiency in the endocytic adaptor proteins PHETA1/2 impairs renal and craniofacial development
Kristin M. Ates, Tong Wang, Trevor Moreland, Rajalakshmi Veeranan-Karmegam, Manxiu Ma, Chelsi Jeter, Priya Anand, Wolfgang Wenzel, Hyung-Goo Kim, Lynne A. Wolfe, Joshi Stephen, David R. Adams, Thomas Markello, Cynthia J. Tifft, Robert Settlage, William A. Gahl, Graydon B. Gonsalvez, May Christine Malicdan, Heather Flanagan-Steet, Y. Albert Pan
Disease Models & Mechanisms 2020 13: dmm041913 doi: 10.1242/dmm.041913 Published 26 May 2020
Kristin M. Ates
1Department of Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA
2Center for Neurobiology Research, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, VA 24016, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tong Wang
1Department of Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA
3JC Self Research Institute, Greenwood Genetic Center, Greenwood, SC 29646, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Trevor Moreland
3JC Self Research Institute, Greenwood Genetic Center, Greenwood, SC 29646, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rajalakshmi Veeranan-Karmegam
4Department of Cellular Biology and Anatomy, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manxiu Ma
1Department of Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA
2Center for Neurobiology Research, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, VA 24016, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Manxiu Ma
Chelsi Jeter
3JC Self Research Institute, Greenwood Genetic Center, Greenwood, SC 29646, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Priya Anand
5Institute of Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Priya Anand
Wolfgang Wenzel
5Institute of Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hyung-Goo Kim
6Neurological Disorder Research Center, Qatar Biomedical Research Institute, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lynne A. Wolfe
7Medical Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lynne A. Wolfe
Joshi Stephen
7Medical Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Joshi Stephen
David R. Adams
7Medical Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Markello
7Medical Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Thomas Markello
Cynthia J. Tifft
7Medical Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Cynthia J. Tifft
Robert Settlage
8Advanced Research Computing Unit, Division of Information Technology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William A. Gahl
7Medical Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
9National Institutes of Health Undiagnosed Diseases Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for William A. Gahl
Graydon B. Gonsalvez
4Department of Cellular Biology and Anatomy, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Graydon B. Gonsalvez
May Christine Malicdan
7Medical Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
9National Institutes of Health Undiagnosed Diseases Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for May Christine Malicdan
Heather Flanagan-Steet
3JC Self Research Institute, Greenwood Genetic Center, Greenwood, SC 29646, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Heather Flanagan-Steet
Y. Albert Pan
1Department of Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA
2Center for Neurobiology Research, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, VA 24016, USA
10Department of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA
11Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA 24016, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Y. Albert Pan
  • For correspondence: yapan@vtc.vt.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Table 1.
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Identification of a de novo mutation in human PHETA1. (A) Images of the UDP patient, presenting with facial asymmetry, concave nasal ridge and malar flattening. Radiograph (right) reveals mild asymmetry of the skull. (B) Radiographs depict scoliosis (arrowhead in left image) and clinodactyly of fourth and fifth digits on both hands (arrowheads in middle and right images). (C) Whole-exome sequencing was performed on both parents and the fraternal twin of the UDP patient. ‘N’ denotes not affected and ‘Y’ denotes affected. The arrow labeled ‘P’ identifies the UDP patient (UDP_5532). ‘+’ indicates the presence of a normal allele, thus marking p.R6C as a heterozygous mutation. (D) COBALT multiple alignment of partial protein sequences of PHETA1 orthologs. The conserved arginine residue is highlighted in red, and amino acid residues that differ from the sequence of the human PHETA1 protein are highlighted in green. The arginine residue is highly conserved across multiple species. (E) Relative quantification of mRNA expression in the patient cells showing that the expression of PHETA1 is not significantly different from that in controls. Error bar represents s.d. from six replicates. (F) 3-D structure of the human PHETA1 protein showing the PH domain (green) with a four-stranded N-terminal and three-stranded C-terminal β-sheet with a helix (orange). The conserved arginine amino acid (Arg19 in the PHETA1 long isoform, yellow) is far from the F&H motif (magenta); however, it stabilizes the folded domain around the C-terminal helix. (G) GFP-tagged full-length WT PHETA1 or PHETA1R6C were expressed in HeLa cells and tested for interaction with full-length HA-tagged OCRL1. Bound proteins detected by western blotting with the indicated antibodies. ‘IP: anti-GFP’ refers to the anti-GFP antibody-bound fraction; ‘Total’ represents the total cell lysate.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Homology and CRISPR-Cas9 targeting of zebrafish pheta1 and pheta2. (A) The domain structures of human PHETA1, human PHETA2, and the zebrafish PHETA homologs Pheta1 and Pheta2. The PH domain, coiled-coil domain, PPPxPPRR motif and OCRL binding site are highlighted. Like human PHETA2, zebrafish Pheta2 lacks the PPPxPPRR motif. (B,C) Genomic organization of human PHETA1 (B) and PHETA2 (C) and their respective homologs in mouse and zebrafish. (D) Phylogenic tree of PHETA proteins. Units indicate the number of amino acid substitutions per site. (E,F) The diagrams on the top illustrate the genomic structures of pheta1 and pheta2, with the guide RNA (gRNA) target marked with the asterisk. Green arrows indicate the primers for RT-PCR. Sequences at the bottom show the gRNA target (underlined) associated with the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM; boxed letters), and the sequences mutated by CRISPR-Cas9 (blue). (G,H) CRISPR-mediated mutations result in reading frame shifts, causing aberrant protein sequences (gray regions) and premature termination of the protein sequences for Pheta1 (G) and Pheta2 (H). The start of frameshift mutation is indicated by the red lines. (I) Normalized counts of pheta1 and pheta2 transcripts. (J,K) RT-PCR amplification of pheta1 (J) and pheta2 (K) complementary DNA (cDNA) from 4 dpf WT, pheta1−/− and pheta2−/− animals, using the primer pairs indicated in E and F. Two lanes from two separate pools of animals are shown for each genotype. No alternative splice forms were detected in the mutants. Expected sizes for pheta1: 326 bp (WT and pheta2−/−) and 288 bp (pheta1−/−). Expected sizes for pheta2: 825 bp (WT and pheta1−/−) and 814 bp (pheta2−/−).

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Loss of pheta1/2 disrupts fluid-phase endocytosis and ciliogenesis in the pronephros. (A,B) Pronephros uptake of Alexa Fluor 488-10 kDa dextran in 3 dpf larvae. (A) Animals were categorized as having high, low or no uptake (WT images are shown). The pronephric tubules are indicated by white dashed lines. Scale bars: 100 µm. (B) Comparison of 10 kDa dextran uptake between genotypes. (C) Representative images of animals injected with 500 kDa dextran. Scale bars: 200 µm. (D) WT and dKO animals injected with ocrl MO at the one-cell stage, then 10 kDa dextran at 3 dpf. (E) Pronephros uptake of RAP-Cy3 at 3 dpf. (F-K′) Representative confocal images of cilia in the pronephros of WT, pheta1−/− and dKO animals. Cilia were labeled with anti-acetylated α-tubulin (green), basal bodies were labeled with anti-γ tubulin (red), and nuclei were labeled with toto-3 or DAPI (blue). Scale bars: 25 µm. Areas within the white dashed boxes in F,G,H,I,J,K are magnified in F′,G′,H′,I′,J′,K′. Arrowheads indicate examples of shorter cilia in dKO animals. Scale bars: 10 µm. (L-O) Quantification of cilia morphology in 3 dpf larvae. Graphs show the cilia number (L) and length (M) in the anterior pronephros, and the cilia number (N) and length (O) in the posterior pronephros. Five cilia were selected from each animal for cilia length measurements. Error=s.e.m. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ****P<0.0001.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Loss of pheta1/2 disrupts craniofacial development. (A,B) Alcian Blue and Alizarin Red staining in 6 dpf animals. Structures are as indicated in the leftmost images. (A) Ventral view of the lower jaw. Representative images from each genotype are shown. Images are quantified in panels C-H. Scale bars: 200 µm. (B) Flat-mount preparations of the lower jaw at 6 dpf. Arrowheads point to where osteogenesis occurs within the ceratohyal cartilage. The number of animals imaged with displayed phenotype is shown in the lower-left corner of each image. Scale bars: 100 µm. (C-H) Morphological measurements of 6 dpf larvae, with the measured distance/area highlighted in red in the above schematics. bsr, brachiostegal ray; ch, ceratohyal; en, entopterygoids; hs, hyosymplectic; m, Meckel's cartilage; op, opercle; pq, palatoquadrate. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Loss of pheta1/2 disrupts chondrocyte maturation. (A) Ceratohyal cartilage, stained with Alcian Blue in flat-mount preparation. Scale bars: 50 µm. (B) Chondrocyte morphology analysis in ceratohyal cartilage (within a 200 µm2 area). (C) Top row: Z-projection ventral view of larvae immunostained for Col2 (green). Nuclei are labeled with DAPI (blue). Scale bars: 100 μm. Middle row: higher-magnification Z-projection images of corresponding ceratohyal cartilage. Scale bars: 25 μm. Bottom row: higher-magnification single optical section images of corresponding ceratohyal cartilage, depicting extracellular secretion of type II collagen. Scale bars: 25 µm. (D,E) Quantification of mean fluorescence intensity in the ceratohyal (D) and Meckel's cartilage (E) in 5 dpf larvae. *P<0.05, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Craniofacial deficits are rescued by Od-mediated inhibition of cathepsin K. (A-D) Mean fluorescence intensity of Col2 immunostaining in the ceratohyal (WT in A, dKO in B) and Meckel's cartilage (WT in C, dKO in D) of 4 dpf larvae with and without Od treatment. (E) Representative images of larvae stained with Alcian Blue. Scale bars: 200 µm. (F-L) Craniofacial morphological measurements at 4 dpf. The measured parameters are highlighted in red in the schematics. (M) In-gel analyses of BMV109, showing cathepsin activities in WT and pheta1/2 mutants at 4 dpf. Blue lines indicate the lane boundaries. (N,O) Quantitation of the cathepsin K and cathepsin L bands from four experiments. Error=s.e.m. ch, ceratohyal; Ctsk, cathepsin K; Ctsl, cathepsin L; m, Meckel's cartilage. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ****P<0.0001.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Pheta1R6C exerts a dominant-negative effect on craniofacial development in the partial or complete absence of Pheta1. (A) Outline of the procedures for generating the Tg(R6C) and Tg(WT) transgenic lines. (B) Confocal images showing broad expression of Pheta1WT-GFP and Pheta1R6C-GFP larvae in transverse cryosections, stained with anti-GFP (green) and DAPI (blue). A control larva with no transgene expression (Tg-Negative) is shown for comparison. Scale bars: 100 μm. (C-E′) Craniofacial measurements of 6 dpf larvae, with schematics shown in C. (D,E) Jaw width of pheta1+/– animals with and without Tg(R6C) (D) and Tg(WT) (E) transgenes. (D′,E′) Jaw width of pheta1−/− animals with and without Tg(R6C) (D′) and Tg(WT) (E′) transgenes. *P<0.05, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001. (F) Summary model. At the subcellular level, PHETA1/2 is known to interact with OCRL to regulate intracellular trafficking, ciliogenesis, endocytosis and secretion. These cellular functions likely enable PHETA1/2 to facilitate renal and craniofacial development, with the latter further requiring cathepsin K regulation. In humans, a deficiency in PHETA1 function potentially leads to abnormal development of the kidney and craniofacial structures. Other functional impairments such as hearing and tongue movement may also be associated with abnormal cartilage or bone formation.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

RSSRSS

Keywords

  • PHETA1
  • IPIP27A
  • OCRL
  • Endocytosis
  • Undiagnosed disease

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Disease Models & Mechanisms.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Deficiency in the endocytic adaptor proteins PHETA1/2 impairs renal and craniofacial development
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Disease Models & Mechanisms
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Disease Models & Mechanisms web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Deficiency in the endocytic adaptor proteins PHETA1/2 impairs renal and craniofacial development
Kristin M. Ates, Tong Wang, Trevor Moreland, Rajalakshmi Veeranan-Karmegam, Manxiu Ma, Chelsi Jeter, Priya Anand, Wolfgang Wenzel, Hyung-Goo Kim, Lynne A. Wolfe, Joshi Stephen, David R. Adams, Thomas Markello, Cynthia J. Tifft, Robert Settlage, William A. Gahl, Graydon B. Gonsalvez, May Christine Malicdan, Heather Flanagan-Steet, Y. Albert Pan
Disease Models & Mechanisms 2020 13: dmm041913 doi: 10.1242/dmm.041913 Published 26 May 2020
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Deficiency in the endocytic adaptor proteins PHETA1/2 impairs renal and craniofacial development
Kristin M. Ates, Tong Wang, Trevor Moreland, Rajalakshmi Veeranan-Karmegam, Manxiu Ma, Chelsi Jeter, Priya Anand, Wolfgang Wenzel, Hyung-Goo Kim, Lynne A. Wolfe, Joshi Stephen, David R. Adams, Thomas Markello, Cynthia J. Tifft, Robert Settlage, William A. Gahl, Graydon B. Gonsalvez, May Christine Malicdan, Heather Flanagan-Steet, Y. Albert Pan
Disease Models & Mechanisms 2020 13: dmm041913 doi: 10.1242/dmm.041913 Published 26 May 2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Conclusions
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Mutant Cx30-A88V mice exhibit hydrocephaly and sex-dependent behavioral abnormalities, implicating a functional role for Cx30 in the brain
  • Resolving the heterogeneity of diaphragmatic mesenchyme: a novel mouse model of congenital diaphragmatic hernia
  • Interpreting the pathogenicity of Joubert syndrome missense variants in Caenorhabditis elegans
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Subject collections

  • Zebrafish as a Disease Model
  • Developmental Disorders

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Biology Open

Advertisement

DMM and COVID-19

We are aware that the COVID-19 pandemic is having an unprecedented impact on researchers worldwide. The Editors of all The Company of Biologists’ journals have been considering ways in which we can alleviate concerns that members of our community may have around publishing activities during this time. Read about the actions we are taking at this time.

Please don’t hesitate to contact the Editorial Office if you have any questions or concerns.


Professor Elizabeth Patton appointed as DMM’s next Editor-in-Chief

We are pleased to announce that The Company of Biologists directors have appointed Professor Elizabeth Patton as DMM's new Editor-in-Chief. As Paresh Vyas writes in his Editorial, Liz ‘brings vitality and a passion for the remit of DMM, and is deeply embedded in the community.’


Did you know DMM Conference Travel Grants can be used for online meetings?

With travel restrictions still in place, we want to continue supporting early-career researchers in their careers. DMM’s Conference Travel Grants can now be used to attend virtual and online scientific meetings, workshops, conferences and training courses.

The current application round closes on 8 February 2021 – find out more.


Identification of MYOM2 as a candidate gene in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and Tetralogy of Fallot, and its functional evaluation in the Drosophila heart

Research from Silke Sperling and colleagues uses Drosophila to identify MYOM2 as a candidate gene in congenital heart malformations in this issue’s Editor’s choice.


C. elegans as a disease model

A new Research article from Doyle et al., models spinal muscular atrophy in C. elegans to show that that targeting therapies to muscle cells is more effective than neuronal delivery. Find more research using C. elegans as a disease model in our latest subject collection.


Call for papers – The RAS Pathway: Diseases, Therapeutics and Beyond

Our upcoming special issue is now welcoming submissions until 1 April 2021. Guest-edited by Donita Brady (Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, USA) and Arvin Dar (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, USA), the issue will focus on the targeting the RAS pathway. Find out more about the issue and how to submit your manuscript.


Interview – Kim Landry-Truchon and Nicolas Houde

In an interview, first authors Kim Landry-Truchon and Nicolas Houde discuss their mouse model of the early stages of pleuropulmonary blastoma, reflecting on the implications of their work and the future of their field.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About DMM
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact DMM
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992