Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About DMM
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contact
    • Contact DMM
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Disease Models & Mechanisms
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Advanced search

RSS   Twitter   Facebook   YouTube

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About DMM
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contact
    • Contact DMM
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Feeding difficulties, a key feature of the Drosophila NDUFS4 mitochondrial disease model
Sarah Foriel, Julien Beyrath, Ilse Eidhof, Richard J. Rodenburg, Annette Schenck, Jan A. M. Smeitink
Disease Models & Mechanisms 2018 11: dmm032482 doi: 10.1242/dmm.032482 Published 27 March 2018
Sarah Foriel
1Khondrion BV, Philips van Leydenlaan 15, 6525 EX, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
2Radboud Center for Mitochondrial Medicine (RCMM) at the Department of Pediatrics, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julien Beyrath
1Khondrion BV, Philips van Leydenlaan 15, 6525 EX, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Julien Beyrath
Ilse Eidhof
3Department of Human Genetics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard J. Rodenburg
2Radboud Center for Mitochondrial Medicine (RCMM) at the Department of Pediatrics, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Richard J. Rodenburg
Annette Schenck
3Department of Human Genetics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Annette Schenck
  • For correspondence: Annette.Schenck@radboudumc.nl Jan.Smeitink@radboudumc.nl
Jan A. M. Smeitink
1Khondrion BV, Philips van Leydenlaan 15, 6525 EX, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
2Radboud Center for Mitochondrial Medicine (RCMM) at the Department of Pediatrics, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jan A. M. Smeitink
  • For correspondence: Annette.Schenck@radboudumc.nl Jan.Smeitink@radboudumc.nl
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Mitochondrial diseases are associated with a wide variety of clinical symptoms and variable degrees of severity. Patients with such diseases generally have a poor prognosis and often an early fatal disease outcome. With an incidence of 1 in 5000 live births and no curative treatments available, relevant animal models to evaluate new therapeutic regimes for mitochondrial diseases are urgently needed. By knocking down ND-18, the unique Drosophila ortholog of NDUFS4, an accessory subunit of the NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase (Complex I), we developed and characterized several dNDUFS4 models that recapitulate key features of mitochondrial disease. Like in humans, the dNDUFS4 KD flies display severe feeding difficulties, an aspect of mitochondrial disorders that has so far been largely ignored in animal models. The impact of this finding, and an approach to overcome it, will be discussed in the context of interpreting disease model characterization and intervention studies.

This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper.

INTRODUCTION

Among the five complexes forming the mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation system (OxPhos), NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase, or Complex I (CI), is the largest and represents a privileged target for mutation. So far, mutations in 33 structural subunit genes are associated with human disease (Mayr et al., 2015). Forty-two of the 44 human CI subunits are conserved in Drosophila melanogaster (Garcia et al., 2017). NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) Fe-S protein 4, 18 kDa (NDUFS4) is an accessory subunit of CI which stabilizes the assembly of the N-module to the Q-module (Guerrero-Castillo et al., 2017; Sánchez-Caballero et al., 2016). NDUFS4 inactivation leads almost invariably to Leigh syndrome and neurological symptoms (Koene et al., 2012). NDUFS4 has a unique Drosophila ortholog called ND-18 (herein referred to as dNDUFS4).

Targeting Drosophila OxPhos genes with RNA interference (RNAi) in a spatially and temporally controlled manner has previously contributed to the deciphering of mitochondrial pathophysiology (Copeland et al., 2009; Foriel et al., 2015; Sánchez-Martínez et al., 2006). Taking advantage of the Drosophila genetic tools available, we inactivated dNDUFS4 ubiquitously and in specific tissues. The need for relevant animal models that recapitulate the symptoms of a disease is crucial to understand and elucidate the pathomechanisms, and to later use the models to develop therapeutic strategies. Feeding difficulties have frequently been reported in patients with CI deficiencies (van den Engel-Hoek et al., 2017; Kisler et al., 2010; Koene et al., 2012, 2013; de Laat et al., 2015; Morava et al., 2006; Ramakers et al., 2017; Read et al., 2012; Smeitink, 2003), but have largely been neglected in animal models for mitochondrial disease. Here, we present a novel Drosophila model of CI deficiency which develops a dramatic feeding impairment, along with other symptoms recapitulating CI-deficient NDUFS4-mutated patient characteristics, such as a severely reduced lifespan, locomotor defects and signs of neurodegeneration.

RESULTS

Generation and validation of a NDUFS4 Drosophila model

Taking advantage of the UAS-Gal4 system and available resources (Dietzl et al., 2007; Flockhart et al., 2006), we induced ubiquitous knockdown of dNDUFS4, the Drosophila ortholog of human NDUFS4 (referred to as dNDUFS4 KD in this article). The efficiency of the dNDUFS4 knockdown in the RNAi flies was assessed by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). The ubiquitous dNDUFS4 KD flies showed only 20% of dNDUFS4 transcript, validating knockdown (KD) at the mRNA level (Fig. S1A). We further ruled out a potential integration of the utilized RNAi construct into the genomic landing site at cytogenetic position 40D (Fig. S1B), which was reported to be associated with off-target effects (Green et al., 2014; Manning et al., 2016).

We next determined the degree to which dNDUFS4 KD affects the enzymatic activity of CI and the other OxPhos complexes [Complexes II to V (CII-CV)]. The spectrophotometer measurements revealed a CI residual activity of 18% in the dNDUFS4 KD flies, with no significant effects on OxPhos CII, CIV and CV (Fig. 1A). CIII activity was increased in the ubiquitous KD flies, potentially representing a compensatory mechanism. These results show that ubiquitous dNDUFS4 KD led to isolated CI deficiency (Fassone et al., 2011; Swalwell et al., 2011).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Morphofunctional characterization of mitochondria in ubiquitous dNDUFS4 KD flies. (A) Enzymatic activity measurement of the mitochondrial OxPhos complexes normalized on citrate synthase (CS). CI activity was reduced to 18.1%±2.8% (***P<0.0001) and CIII activity was increased to 140.4%±23.7% (*P<0.0102) in ubiquitous KD flies (mean± s.e.m., n=5, two-way ANOVA). (B-G) Transmission electron microscopy of indirect flight muscle. (B) Representative image of mitochondria in controls. (C) Representative image of mitochondria in dNDUFS4 KD flies. Mitochondria with dispersed cristae are indicated by black arrowheads. In D-G, asterisks indicate examples of mitochondria with structural defects found in ubiquitous KD fly samples. (D) Mitochondrion with onion-like inner membrane. (E) Swollen mitochondrion. (F) Mitochondrion with sparse matrix/distant cristae. (G) Mitochondria with irregular cristae densities. Scale bars: 1 µm in B and C; 2 µm in D-G.

The effects of dNDUFS4 KD on mitochondrial morphology were assessed by electron microscopy in the indirect flight muscle, a tissue requiring extensive energy production. Mitochondria in control flight muscles appeared intact and were characterized by compact lamellar cristae. Mitochondria in the flight muscle of dNDUFS4 KD flies presented with a wide range of structural abnormalities (Fig. 1B-G). Morphological defects consisted of dispersed cristae (Fig. 1C), onion-like swirling membranes (Fig. 1D), swollen mitochondria (Fig. 1E), sparse matrix (Fig. 1F) and irregular cristae densities (Fig. 1G).

Together, the reduced amount of dNDUFS4 transcripts and mitochondrial morphofunctional defects confirmed the dNDUFS4 KD flies as a model for CI deficiency.

Ubiquitous dNDUFS4 KD flies display a severe feeding impairment

Drosophila pupae eclosion is a high energy-demanding process (Merkey et al., 2011). As a consequence, defects in oxidative phosphorylation can lead to eclosion defects. Quantification of eclosed and dead pupae 7 days after onset of eclosion in the culture vials revealed a significantly reduced eclosion rate (37% pupal eclosion) in ubiquitous dNDUFS4 KD flies compared with that (97%) in controls (P<0.0001) (Fig. S1C). A fraction of the eclosed dNDUFS4 KD adults appeared weak, fell onto the food and died rapidly. To ensure that falling onto the food was not causing the premature death, we kept vials horizontally. This did not improve the survival of the dNDUFS4 KD flies. Upon daily inspection, we observed that the surviving ubiquitous dNDUFS4 KD flies presented a dramatic and progressive shrinkage of the abdomen in the first days after eclosion (Fig. 2A) but laid eggs. To investigate whether this observation was caused by feeding defects, we exposed ubiquitous dNDUFS4 KD and control flies at larval and adult stages to regular cornmeal fly food supplemented with Bromophenol Blue. Upon intake, this dye colors the digestive system of the flies (crop, midgut and hindgut) and gives a qualitative indication of the food intake without apparent effect on fly development or health. The digestive system of third instar control larvae (Fig. S2A) and adult flies (Fig. 2B) displayed a strong blue color after 1 day on the dyed food. The midgut and hindgut of dNDUFS4 KD larvae showed less intense staining compared with the controls (Fig. S2A). No staining could be detected in the midgut and hindgut of adult ubiquitous KD flies, highlighting a striking feeding defect (Fig. 2B). Despite actively extending their proboscis to get in contact with the food, the ubiquitous KD flies failed to uptake food.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

The ubiquitous dNDUFS4 KD model presents feeding deficits. Control flies are presented on the left and ubiquitous KD flies on the right, as indicated. (A) Representative images of abdomen evolution over time upon regular cornmeal feeding, highlighting a progressive shrinkage of the KD fly abdomen. All dNDUFS4 KD flies presented abdominal shrinkage. D0 represents the day of collection (0 to 1 day old), D1 represents 1-2 days old, etc. (B,C) Analysis of the digestive system upon solid and liquid food supplemented with 0.5% Bromophenol Blue. Upon regular cornmeal fly food, the digestive system of all ubiquitous KD flies appeared blue-free (B). When subjected to 5% sucrose with Bromophenol Blue delivered in capillaries, both control and ubiquitous dNDUFS4 KD flies were able to ingest liquid food formulation, although the KD flies seemed to eat qualitatively less (C). White arrowheads indicate the crop and gut. (D) Effects of liquid feeding on progressive abdomen shrinkage. The KD flies with liquid feeding presented a dramatically slower shrinkage compared with the solid-feeding flies (note the different last timepoint of the time series).

As the dNDUFS4 KD flies appeared unable to efficiently take up the regular agar-cornmeal medium in this formulation, we provided them with a 5% sucrose solution (‘liquid feeding’, as opposed to the regular ‘solid feeding’) dyed with Bromophenol Blue. Under these conditions, the digestive systems of both the dNDUFS4 KD and control flies were strongly stained, confirming their abilities to take up liquid food (Fig. 2C). In addition, the abdomen shrinkage phenotype of the solid fed dNDUFS4 KD flies was strongly delayed in the liquid-fed KD flies (Fig. 2A versus D). Therefore, providing the ubiquitous dNDUFS4 KD flies with a 5% sucrose solution appeared to alleviate, to a certain extent, the feeding difficulties encountered with the regular cornmeal fly food.

Ubiquitous KD flies have a dramatic lifespan defect

The outcome of patients with NDUFS4 mutations in general is poor, with death occurring in early childhood (Fassone and Rahman, 2012; Koene et al., 2012; Rahman et al., 1996). We therefore investigated the lifespan of the ubiquitous dNDUFS4 KD models. The surviving ubiquitous KD flies presented a dramatically reduced lifespan (P<0.0001) with a median survival (time at which 50% of the flies have died) of 3 days versus 57 days for the control flies (Fig. 3), consistent with the dramatically reduced lifespan of patients with NDUFS4 mutations. We next evaluated whether the feeding difficulty and resulting starvation were mainly responsible for the reduced lifespan observed in the dNDUFS4 KD flies. Indeed, 5% sucrose solution-fed dNDUFS4 KD flies survived significantly longer (P<0.0001) than their solid-fed siblings, with 7 days versus 3 days median survival, accounting only for a partial lifespan rescue (Fig. 3). It is worth noting that the control flies fed with 5% sucrose solution died significantly faster (P<0.0001) than the solid-fed control flies (Fig. 3). In addition, ubiquitous KD flies maintained on H2O only, had a similar median survival (of 3 days) to ubiquitous KD flies exposed to regular cornmeal food (Fig. S2B). These findings confirm that the ubiquitous KD flies have difficulties with ingesting nutrients, leading to a very short lifespan that could partially be rescued by liquid feeding with sucrose.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Effects of solid and liquid feeding on the lifespan of control and ubiquitous dNDUFS4 KD flies. Survival curve of ubiquitous dNDUFS4 KD flies and their corresponding controls fed with regular cornmeal medium or 5% sucrose. Solid-fed ubiquitous dNDUFS4 KD flies (n=198) die significantly faster than their genetic controls (n=222), with median survival (day at which 50% of the flies have died) at day 3 for KD flies and day 57 for control flies. When fed with 5% sucrose in capillaries, ubiquitous KD flies (n=325) displayed a reduced lifespan compared with control flies (n=249), with respective median survival at day 7 and day 34 (Kaplan–Meier curve, log-rank Mantel–Cox test, ****P<0.0001).

Ubiquitous dNDUFS4 KD flies exhibit strong locomotion impairment

CI deficiency frequently results in loss of motor skills and fatigue, in addition to a plethora of other complaints. We set out to characterize locomotor abilities of ubiquitous dNDUFS4 KD and control flies by filming and tracking them when walking freely in an arena. The dNDUFS4 KD flies exhibited a significantly reduced walking distance compared with control flies (P<0.0001), with 905.6±105.0 mm versus 2248±185.3 mm per 7 min observation interval (Fig. 4A). They also showed a strong unbalanced gait and righting defects (Movie 1). Surprisingly, liquid feeding did not improve the locomotor abilities of ubiquitous dNDUFS4 KD flies. Liquid-fed KD flies walked significantly less (220.9±49.9 mm/7 min) than liquid-fed control flies (2441±202.7 mm/7 min, P<0.0001) or solid-fed dNDUFS4 KD flies (905.6±105.0 mm/7min, P<0.0001) (Fig. 4A). They also showed the characteristic unbalanced gait and righting impairment previously observed in solid-fed flies (Movie 1). These results are, however, in line with the fact that starvation induces locomotion activity in Drosophila (Connolly, 1966; Yang et al., 2015; Yu et al., 2016). Additionally, we did not observe differences in the average distance walked between solid- and liquid-fed control flies (P<0.4882) (Fig. 4A), suggesting that the nutrient limitation of the liquid feeding did not impair the locomotion of healthy flies. Because both the nutritional (fed or not) and health (CI deficient or not) status influence spontaneous locomotion of Drosophila, interpretation of the obtained data is challenging.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Ubiquitous dNDUFS4 KD flies display locomotion impairments. (A) The spontaneous locomotion assay highlighted a reduced total walked distance of solid-fed ubiquitous KD flies (905.6±105 mm/7 min; n=19) compared with controls (2248±185.3 mm/7 min; n=20). The liquid-fed dNDUFS4 KD flies had a severely reduced total walked distance over 7 min of acquisition (220.9±49.9 mm/7 min; n=18) compared with the controls (2441±202.7 mm/7 min; n=20) and their solid-fed siblings (***P<0.0001, unpaired Student's t-test, mean±s.e.m.; ns, nonsignificant). (B) Climbing abilities or time necessary for 70% of the flies to climb 9.5 cm. The climbing assay revealed impaired negative geotaxis of the solid-fed ubiquitous KD flies (30.7±1.920, n=8) compared with controls (5.2±0.2, n=4) (***P<0.0001). The liquid-fed ubiquitous dNDUFS4 KD flies also presented with negative geotaxis impairment (31.6±1.3 s, n=10) compared with the controls (5.3±0.2, n=4) (***P<0.0001, unpaired Student's t-test, mean±s.e.m.; ns, nonsignificant). Diet did not improve or impair the climbing abilities of ubiquitous KD flies (P<0.67). (C) Island assay. Solid-fed ubiquitous KD flies spent significantly (***P<0.0001) more time on the platform as expressed by the area under the curve (AUC) (685.2±156.7, n=8, for the controls; 6028±247.6, n=13, for the ubiquitous KD flies). The liquid-fed ubiquitous dNDUFS4 KD flies also spent significantly more time on the platform (AUC, 852.3±231.1; n=8) than the control flies (4727±584.2; n=8) (***P<0.0001). Liquid feeding improved the performances of ubiquitous KD flies in the island assay (*P<0.0293) (unpaired Student's t-test, mean±s.e.m.; ns, nonsignificant).

We therefore extended the characterization of locomotor abilities to include challenging conditions. The climbing assay relies on the natural behavior of flies to climb against gravity when tapped down, also referred to as negative geotaxis reflex. Compared with control flies, the ubiquitous dNDUFS4 KD flies displayed a significant climbing defect (P<0.0001). It took 5.2±0.2 s for 70% of the control flies to climb 9.5 cm, whereas the ubiquitous KD flies took 30.69±1.920 s (Fig. 4B). We did not observe a difference in climbing abilities between the solid- and liquid-fed dNDUFS4 KD flies (P<0.67), or between the solid- and liquid-fed control flies (P<0.9221) (Fig. 4B). We additionally assessed the challenged locomotor function in the island assay. In this test, flies were thrown onto a platform surrounded by water, triggering a flight escape response. The control flies left the platform within seconds, whereas dNDUFS4 KD flies were not able to efficiently initiate and/or execute the escape and remained substantially longer on the platform. This observation was quantified by averaging the area under the curve (AUC), and the control flies had a much smaller AUC (685.2±156.7) than the ubiquitous KD flies (6028±247.6; P<0.0001) (Fig. 4C). Interestingly, liquid feeding improved the flight escape abilities of dNDUFS4 KD flies when thrown on the platform in the island assay (P<0.0293), but had no significant effect on the flight escape abilities of the controls (P<0.5591) (Fig. 4C).

In conclusion, we show a partial amelioration in island assay performance in liquid-fed ubiquitous KD flies. The climbing abilities of these flies did not improve upon liquid feeding.

dNDUFS4 KD flies display brain histological defects

To further characterize the consequences of the feeding difficulties of adult flies, we analyzed lipid storage in head histological sections of solid- and liquid-fed animals. The solid-fed dNDUFS4 KD flies presented a drastic pericerebral fat body deficit compared with control flies of the same age and identical diet (Fig. 5A). This fat storage impairment is consistent with observations in other animal models of mitochondrial disease, but is poorly characterized and understood (Johnson et al., 2013; Lindfors et al., 2011; Tyynismaa et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2016). Interestingly, while we showed that successful feeding with 5% sucrose solution could improve the lifespan of the dNDUFS4 flies (Fig. 3), it had no detectable effect on the head fat body deficit (Fig. 5B). Together, these data emphasize the importance of feeding defects in CI deficiencies and suggest a contribution to a number of key phenotypes associated with CI disorders.

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Ubiquitous dNDUFS4 KD flies have a strongly reduced pericerebral fat body. (A,B) Transverse sections of 1-day-old fly heads stained with Toluidine Blue. Black arrows point at the pericerebral fat body. The intensity of the histological staining, Toluidine Blue, is not indicative of differences in fat composition. (A) Control and ubiquitous KD flies fed with solid food. (B) Control and ubiquitous KD flies fed with liquid food. Both solid- and liquid-fed KD flies displayed dramatic pericerebral fat body depletion.

The histology sections also revealed neurodegenerative lesions in the central nervous system (CNS) of both the solid- and liquid-fed dNDUFS4 KD flies (Fig. 5A,B). Of note, we observed fewer lesions in the head sections of the liquid-fed dNDUFS4 KD flies compared with the solid-fed KD flies. This neurodegeneration is in line with the observed severe unbalanced gait and righting defects in both solid- and liquid-fed dNDUFS4 KD flies (Movie 1).

Tissue-specific dNDUFS4 KD recapitulates the reduced lifespan and, partially, the locomotor defects of ubiquitous dNDUFS4 KD

Mitochondrial diseases are phenotypically highly heterogeneous multisystemic disorders. To elucidate the potential contribution of muscles (e.g. in the proboscis or intestine) to the feeding phenotype, we selectively knocked down dNDUFS4 in differentiated muscle using the Mhc-Gal4 driver. The maximal lifespan of the muscle KD flies was significantly reduced (P<0.0001), with a median survival of 11 days for the KD flies compared with 49 days for the control flies (Fig. 6A). Importantly, the muscle KD faithfully reproduced the feeding difficulties, as depicted by only very faint blue staining of the digestive system (Fig. 6B). It also reproduced the locomotor impairments of the ubiquitous KD, as illustrated by an unbalanced walk and righting defect (Movie 1). Thus, the muscle KD recapitulated the lifespan, feeding and locomotor defects of the ubiquitous dNDUFS4 KD flies.

Fig. 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Characterization of muscle- and neuron-specific NDUFS4 KD. (A) Survival curve of flies collected at D0 fed with regular cornmeal fly medium. Muscle KD flies (n=151) die significantly faster than their genetic controls (n=85) (****P<0.0001), with a median survival of 11 and 49 days, respectively. (B) Abdomen photography of flies fed with regular cornmeal medium supplemented with 0.5% Bromophenol Blue highlighted important feeding difficulties, although the intestines showed a faint blue coloration. (C) The neuronal KD flies (n=167, median survival 45 days) died at an earlier age than their isogenic controls (n=129, median survival 58 days) (****P<0.0001) (Kaplan–Meier curve, log-rank Mantel–Cox test, GraphPad Prism 6). (D) Food supplemented with 0.5% Bromophenol Blue also highlighted feeding difficulties, but with a milder degree of severity. White arrowheads indicate the crop and gut.

Because neurological involvement is often prominent in mitochondrial disease, we also selectively knocked down dNDUFS4 in the brain using the panneuronal elav-Gal4 driver. Once more, the lifespan of the neuronal KD flies was significantly affected (P<0.0001), with a median survival of 45 days for the neuronal KD flies versus 58 days for the control flies (Fig. 6C). The neuronal dNDUFS4 KD flies exhibited a mild decrease in food uptake in comparison to the control flies (Fig. 6D). On the other hand, the neuronal dNDUFS4 KD flies did not present locomotor defects (neither gait unbalance nor righting defect), but did exhibit a progressive impairment in the negative geotaxis response, a crucial innate behavior in flies, in both solid and liquid feeding conditions (Movie 2).

These findings highlight the broad spectrum of clinical presentations and organ involvement recapitulated by the dNDUFS4 KD Drosophila models, and indicate that the overall phenotypes of ubiquitous dNDUFS4 KD originate from multi-organ defects.

DISCUSSION

We here report new ubiquitous and tissue-specific knockdown models for mitochondrial CI deficiency, induced by targeted knockdown of the Drosophila NDUFS4 ortholog, dNDUFS4. The relevance of a Drosophila model for mitochondrial disease lies in its capacity to recapitulate the fundamental characteristics of the disease (Foriel et al., 2015; Pandey and Nichols, 2011; Sen and Cox, 2017). The dNDUFS4 model reported here shows key features of mitochondrial disease with a clear isolated CI deficiency (Fig. 1A) and structure anomalies of mitochondria (Fig. 1B-G). Like patients with Leigh syndrome, Ndufs4−/− mice (Kruse et al., 2008) and some other Leigh-like Drosophila models (Da-Rè et al., 2014), the dNDUFS4 KD flies display a dramatic lifespan reduction (Fig. 3) as well as histologic and behavioral signs of neurodegeneration (Fig. 5A,B; Movies 1 and 2). Impairment of patients' motor skills is well documented by the six-minute walking test or the GAITRite Walkway system (Ramakers et al., 2017; Stephenson et al., 2015), and has also been demonstrated in murine models using the rotarod, rope grip and CatWalk gait analyses (de Haas et al., 2016). The present study, thorough locomotor assessment with multiple assays, demonstrated a severe motor impairment of the dNDUFS4 KD flies as exemplified by an unbalanced walking pattern (Movie 1), reduced walking distance (Fig. 4A), and defects in climbing and flight responses (Fig. 4B,C). Further observations led to the identification of a dramatic feeding defect that could be partially improved by a liquid feeding approach with a 5% sucrose solution (Fig. 2A-D). In summary, the dNDUFS4 KD models recapitulate important features and characteristics of human CI disorders, making them relevant models with which to study mitochondrial disease.

Reduced food intake or malnutrition has dramatic consequences on the clinical outcome of patients with mitochondrial disease (Morava et al., 2006). Often, patients with nuclear-encoded CI deficiency and mitochondrial diseases are suffering from hypotonia, fatigue during mastication, feeding problems/starvation, swallowing difficulties, vomiting and dysphagia (van den Engel-Hoek et al., 2017; Koene et al., 2012, 2013; Morava et al., 2006; Noorda et al., 2007; Parikh et al., 2009; Wortmann et al., 2009). The feeding phenotype has been poorly studied in animal models of mitochondrial disease. In 2010, Tyynismaa et al. described in skeletal muscles of Deletor mice a transcriptional response mimicking amino acid, lipid starvation and induction of fasting-related hormone fibroblast growth factor 21 (Fgf21) (Tyynismaa et al., 2010). Deletor mice express a dominant patient mutation in the mitochondrial replicative helicase Twinkle that results in accumulation of mtDNA deletions and progressive respiratory chain deficiency. A second model was reported by Lindfors et al. in 2011, and makes the link between mitochondrial/CI dysfunction and anorexia in an anx/anx mouse model (Lindfors et al., 2011). In fact, the NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1 alpha subcomplex, assembly factor 1 (Ndufaf1) gene was found to be located in the interval of the anx gene and was downregulated in the anx/anx mice. Aside from these two models, one can find mentioned in the literature food provided ad libitum to facilitate the nutrition of weak animals, such as Ndufs4−/− mice (Alam et al., 2015; Choi et al., 2017; Karamanlidis et al., 2013; Kruse et al., 2008; Quintana et al., 2010, 2012).

Drosophila normally feed on microorganisms growing on the surface of fruits (nature) or gelatinous cornmeal medium (laboratory) by rhythmic, repetitive extensions and retractions of their proboscis (Itskov et al., 2014; Pool and Scott, 2014). dNDUFS4 KD flies display normal feeding behavioral modules (Pool and Scott, 2014) and try to feed on agar-cornmeal medium by extending and retracting their proboscis extensively, but the meal consumption appears to not be efficient with the consequence that eclosed flies rapidly die after pupal eclosion. Because sweet food stimulates consumption in Drosophila (Joseph et al., 2017), we provided 5% sucrose to the ubiquitous dNDUFS4 KD model in liquid form, expecting to trigger a feeding response. In the literature, liquid feeding refers to sucrose solutions of various concentrations (Diegelmann et al., 2017; Manzo et al., 2012; Qi et al., 2015; Ro et al., 2014). The 5% sucrose solution used in this work was clearly ingested and partially alleviated the effects of starvation on the lifespan and some locomotor aspects of CI-deficient flies. It would be interesting to further investigate the effects of different concentrations of sucrose or a more complete liquid diet (Deshpande et al., 2014; Gasque et al., 2013; Ja et al., 2007) to mimic the dietary intervention and optimization of nutritional intake applied in patients (Morava et al., 2006; Parikh et al., 2009). The administration of a more complete diet might, however, be challenging when delivered in capillaries because of the high viscosity of the solution and potential for increased thickening due to evaporation. Although pure sucrose solution is not an ideal medium in terms of nutrient constitution and will ultimately affect animal health, it offers greater options for experimental therapeutic dosing and uptake.

Spontaneous locomotor activity differs from challenged activity by the absence of external stimulus (Knoppien et al., 2000). Typically, the locomotion assay refers to spontaneous locomotion. In this assay, dNDUFS4 KD flies in the solid-feeding group which do not manage to feed walk significantly more, probably because they are foraging for food sources (Connolly, 1966; Knoppien et al., 2000; Yu et al., 2016). On the other hand, liquid-fed dNDUFS4 KD flies remain quiescent, probably to save energy, owing to their overall weakness resulting from the CI deficiency and lack of need to search for food. These results illustrate the complex interpretation of spontaneous locomotion as readout in models with feeding problems, because the distance walked by the diseased flies is also influenced by this phenotype (Martin, 2003). This, in turn, highlights the importance of identifying feeding difficulties in animal models of mitochondrial disease as this condition might interfere with the outcome and interpretation of the data. Interestingly, when comparing solid- and liquid-fed dNDUFS4 KD flies in the island assay (a challenged locomotion assay), we could observe an improvement of the flight escape upon a liquid diet. These results confirm the relevance of carefully choosing the readouts or assays to be examined according to the characteristics of the model to be used.

Among the various signs and symptoms studied in the dNDUFS4 KD model, only the pericerebral fat body deficit and climbing abilities were not improved by the liquid diet. Starvation in the solid-fed dNDUFS4 KD flies and nutrient restriction in the liquid-fed KD flies can possibly explain the mobilization of the lipid reserves and therefore reduced pericerebral fat body thickness to produce the energy to survive (Arrese and Soulages, 2010; Kühnlein, 2011; Rajan and Perrimon, 2013). Noteworthy, the pericerebral fat body in control flies was not affected by the 5% sucrose solution, suggesting that the fat body deficit observed in dNDUFS4 KD flies could originate independently from, or prior to, the feeding condition, and highlights a primary mitochondrial defect.

Also, the climbing response is not improved by liquid food administration and this specific parameter is strongly impaired in the neuronal dNDUFS4 KD flies, providing evidence for neurodegeneration. Both phenotypes might well reflect primary and severe mitochondrial defects. Yet, phenotypes that are ameliorated upon liquid feeding and therefore reversible by nature, such as lifespan, locomotion and island escape, could represent suitable outcomes to assess therapeutic efficacy.

The challenges of treating mitochondrial diseases lie in their extreme heterogeneous clinical presentations (Fassone and Rahman, 2012; Koene et al., 2012; Koenig, 2008; Rahman et al., 1996). With the dNDUFS4 KD fly model, we were able to establish a library of phenotypes recapitulating this heterogeneity. These can be further used for therapeutic evaluation (Foriel et al., 2015; Pandey and Nichols, 2011). The high level of complexity and severity might, however, impair the development of therapeutic approaches. Importantly, most mitochondrial diseases involve multiple organ systems and prominently neurological and myopathic features (Chinnery, 2014). As an alternative to ubiquitous KD, tissue-specific KD approaches could be used. In our study, both muscle and neuronal dNDUFS4 KD recapitulated specific phenotypes observed in ubiquitous KD, such as reduced lifespan, feeding difficulties, locomotor impairment and climbing defect. These tissue-specific KD models might, therefore, allow a more refined therapeutic approach by targeting specific phenotypes according to the drug of interest.

In summary, multiple lines of evidence establish the dNDUFS4 KD flies as new, highly disease-relevant models of CI deficiency. These models emphasize the importance of detecting feeding difficulties, and its existence in relation to the interpretation of results. It can finally be applied to study mitochondrial disease pathomechanisms and present several advantages for compound testing perspectives.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Drosophila stocks and stock maintenance

The conditional RNAi line targeting mitochondrial CI subunit dNDUFS4 (vdrc101489), its genetic background (vdrc60100) and the UAS-Dicer-2 (vdrc60008) strains (Dietzl et al., 2007) were obtained from the Vienna Drosophila Resource Center (VDRC). A second RNAi line (vdrc42983) and its genetic background (vdrc60000) were also recruited and tested, but were found to be ineffective [neither induced KD nor the impaired feeding phenotype (Fig. S3A,B)]. Therefore, vdrc101489 was used for the RNAi line and vdrc60100 was used for the control. The actin-Gal4/TM6c, Sb Tb driver was obtained from Christiane Zweier, Humangenetisches Institut, Germany. The panneuronal elav-Gal4 (BL8760) and the muscle Mhc-Gal4 (BL55132) drivers were obtained from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (Indiana University, USA). The driver w1118; UAS-Dicer-2; elav-Gal4 was assembled in house. All stocks were maintained on standard cornmeal-agar medium at 25°C in a 12 h:12 h light-dark cycle.

Ubiquitous and tissue-specific dNDUFS4 KD

KD was achieved using the modulable binary UAS/Gal4 system (Brand and Perrimon, 1993). Ten virgin females from the UAS-RNAi line or its isogenic control line were crossed with ten Gal4 line males at 28°C and 60% humidity. The progeny of the crosses carrying both Gal4 driver and UAS-RNAi constructs are referred to as ubiquitous KD when the actin-Gal4 driver was used, muscle KD when the Mhc-Gal4 was used, neuronal KD when UAS-dicer2; elav-Gal4 was used, and as control flies when the genetic background of the dNDUFS4 UAS-RNAi line was crossed with either of the three respective drivers. After 24 h premating, crosses were transferred to the ‘experimental vial’ for 2-3 days to allow adequate population density. Fifteen days after the transfer on experimental vial, the total number of pupae, empty pupae and dead pupae were counted for each vial to evaluate the eclosion rate and pupae lethality. The day of fly collection is referred to as day 0 (D0) and corresponds to flies with an age of 0 to 1 day. Flies were either transferred to standard cornmeal-agar medium, referred to as ‘solid fed’, or to 5% w/v sucrose/Milli-Q H2O solution provided in haematocrit capillaries 75 mm/75 ul (Hirschmann Laborgeraete), referred to as ‘liquid fed’. For all the experiments, unless specified otherwise, female flies (D1, 1-2 days old) were used.

qRT-PCR

Primers spanning the junction between exon 2 and 3 were designed with the software Primer 3 Plus (www.bioinformatics.nl/cgi-bin/primer3plus/primer3plus.cgi) using the Drosophila melanogaster dNDUFS4 (CG12203) nucleic sequence from the Ensembl database (http://www.ensembl.org/index.html). dNDUFS4 forward primer: 5′-AAGATCACCGTGCCGACTG-3′ and dNDUFS4 reverse primer: 5′-GACAATGGGTCGCCGCTG-3′ were used. Total RNA from control and ubiquitous KD flies were isolated using an RNeasy Lipid Tissue Mini Kit (Qiagen), according to the manufacturer's instructions, and treated with DNase I (Ambion). RNA concentration was measured with Qubit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and cDNA synthesis was performed with a Bio-Rad iScript™ Reverse Transcription Supermix. qPCR was performed using SyBR Green (Promega). Relative dNDUFS4 gene expression was determined against the geometric mean of two housekeeping genes: γ-tubulin and polymerase 2. For each genotype, three biological replicates and two technical replicates were performed. Student’s t-test was performed using Prism 6 (GraphPad software, LaJolla, CA) to determine statistical significance (*P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001).

Validation of hairpin insertion locus

DNA of individual flies from the isogenic control line vdrc60100 (negative control, no hairpin), the G9a RNAi line vdrc110662 (positive control, double insertion at 30B and 40D) and the dNDUFS4 RNAi line vdrc101489 were isolated in DNA isolation buffer and proteinase K (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Diagnostic PCR was performed according to the guidelines provided by Green et al. (2014). Sequence 5′→3′: forward primer for the off-target associated 40D pKC43 site 5′-GCCCACTGTCAGCTCTCAAC-3′; forward primer for the 30B pKC43 integration site: 5′-GCTGGCGAACTGTCAATCAC-3′; reverse primer for pKC26: 5′-TGTAAAACGACGGCCAGT-3′. PCR using the 40D pKC43 forward primer in combination with the pKC26 reverse primer results in a ∼450 bp product in case of insertion; a ∼600 bp product is obtained in case of insertion when using the 30B PKC43 forward primer together with the pKC26 reverse primer.

OxPhos enzymatic activity

Solid-fed 1-day-old (D1) flies were collected, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen in groups of 30 (five replicates), and preserved at −80°C. The mitochondrial fraction was isolated after homogenizing the flies with a glass pestle in 1mL SETH buffer (0.25 M sucrose, 2 mM EDTA-K, 10 mM Tris, 5×104 U/l heparin) and centrifugation at 600 g for 10 min at 4°C. Two 200 µl aliquots of the 600 g supernatant were used for the OxPhos measurement (CI, CII, CII and CIV) following previously described methods (Rodenburg, 2011). The remaining samples were centrifuged at 14,000 g for 10 min at 4°C. The pellet was subsequently resolubilized in 400 µl Tris HCl (pH 7.6) for Complex V activity. The measurements were realized with a Konelab 20×Ti instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Complex activities were normalized against citrate synthase activity and presented as percentages of the averaged values of the control flies. A multiple comparison test with Bonferroni correction was performed using GraphPad Prism 6 to determine the statistical significance of differences (*P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; ****P<0.0001).

Histology and electron microscopy

Ubiquitous dNDUFS4 KD flies and their controls were collected (at D0) and fed with regular solid food or 5% sucrose for 1 day (D1). Heads and thoraces were bisected and fixed overnight in 2% glutaraldehyde buffered with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate, pH 7.4. Subsequently, the samples were postfixed for 1 h in 1% osmium teroxide in Palade buffer, pH 7.4, with 0.5% potassium hexacyanoferrate (III) trihydrate, dehydrated in ethanol and propylenoxide and embedded in Epon. Semithin, 0.5-1 µm transverse and longitudinal sections were stained with 1% Toluidine Blue. Ultrathin sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and examined in a JEOL 1200 electron microscope.

Lifespan

Newly eclosed flies (D0) were collected in groups of 20 per vial with a minimum of four replicates per genotype and maintained at 28°C. They were transferred to fresh cornmeal-agar medium every 2-3 days. The 5% sucrose solution (or Milli-Q H2O for starvation) was provided in capillaries that were refilled every day. Each experiment was repeated at least two times. Kaplan–Meier curves and statistical analysis was performed according to GraphPad Prism 6 survival function, with a log-rank Mantel–Cox test to determine statistical significance (*P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; ****P<0.0001).

Drosophila images

Adult flies of the same age (minimum n=5) were collected and maintained under CO2 anesthesia and/or dissected in 1× PBS for abdominal photography upon aging. Extended focus images were acquired using Axiovision software. The addition of Bromophenol Blue 0.5% (w/v) to the food (solid or liquid) allowed for qualitative evaluation of feeding abilities of larvae and adult flies (Amcheslavsky et al., 2014). Pictures were taken after 1 day feeding on food supplemented with Bromophenol Blue. All images show representative examples of the population.

Locomotion, climbing and island assay

D0 flies were aliquoted in groups of five or 10 flies and allowed to recover from CO2 anesthesia for 24 h (on cornmeal agar or 5% sucrose fed). For locomotion tracking, five flies were placed in an arena of 3.7 cm diameter and 0.3 mm height. After 5 min adaptation, the video acquisition was started. Locomotion was recorded using a Logitec webcam and the HandyAvi program. The time lapse was set to 10 images/s, and 7 min were recorded. Tracking was performed with Ctrax and FixErrors Matlab GUI using the guidelines of Branson et al. (2009). For the climbing assay, 10 flies were placed in a vial of 23 mm diameter and 18.5 cm height, and allowed to acclimate for 5 min. The time required for seven flies (70% of the population) to cross a mark at 9.5 cm height after tapping them down was assessed over three trials in blinded experiments. Finally, the island assay was performed according to Eidhof et al. (2017).

Acknowledgements

We thank Lilian Eshuis for head histology and electron microscopy, Job Berkhout for contributing to the climbing and island assays, and Herma Renkema for contributing to the mitochondria preparation for OxPhos enzyme activity measurement.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    S.F., J.B. and J.A.M.S. hold positions at Khondrion BV, a mitochondrial medicine company.

  • Author contributions

    Conceptualization: S.F., J.B., A.S., J.A.M.S.; Methodology: S.F., I.E.; Software: I.E.; Validation: S.F.; Formal analysis: S.F.; Investigation: S.F., R.J.R.; Resources: I.E., R.J.R.; Writing - original draft: S.F., J.B.; Writing - review & editing: S.F., J.B., A.S., J.A.M.S.; Visualization: S.F., J.B., A.S.; Supervision: J.B., A.S., J.A.M.S.; Project administration: J.B., A.S., J.A.M.S.; Funding acquisition: J.B., J.A.M.S.

  • Funding

    This work was supported by the Seventh Framework Programme (317433) and Stichting Energy4All (www.energy4all.eu).

  • Supplementary information

    Supplementary information available online at http://dmm.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/dmm.032482.supplemental

  • Received October 11, 2017.
  • Accepted February 26, 2018.
  • © 2018. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Alam, M. T.,
    2. Manjeri, G. R.,
    3. Rodenburg, R. J.,
    4. Smeitink, J. A. M.,
    5. Notebaart, R. A.,
    6. Huynen, M.,
    7. Willems, P. H. G. M. and
    8. Koopman, W. J. H.
    (2015). Skeletal muscle mitochondria of NDUFS4−/− mice display normal maximal pyruvate oxidation and ATP production. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Bioenerg. 1847, 526-533. doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2015.02.006
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. Amcheslavsky, A.,
    2. Song, W.,
    3. Li, Q.,
    4. Nie, Y.,
    5. Bragatto, I.,
    6. Ferrandon, D.,
    7. Perrimon, N. and
    8. Ip, Y. T.
    (2014). Enteroendocrine cells support intestinal stem-cell-mediated homeostasis in Drosophila. Cell Rep. 9, 32-39. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.052
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Arrese, E. L. and
    2. Soulages, J. L.
    (2010). Insect fat body: energy, metabolism, and regulation. Annu. Rev. Etomol. 55, 207-225. doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085356
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Brand, A. H. and
    2. Perrimon, N.
    (1993). Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118, 401-415.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  5. ↵
    1. Branson, K.,
    2. Robie, A. A.,
    3. Bender, J.,
    4. Perona, P. and
    5. Dickinson, M. H.
    (2009). High-throughput ethomics in large groups of Drosophila. Nat. Methods 6, 451-457. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1328
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Chinnery, P. F.
    (2014). Mitochondrial Disorders Overview. In GeneReviews® [Internet] (ed. M. P. Adam, H. H. Ardinger, R. A. Pagon et al.). Seattle: University of Washington.
  7. ↵
    1. Choi, W.-S.,
    2. Kim, H.-W.,
    3. Tronche, F.,
    4. Palmiter, R. D.,
    5. Storm, D. R. and
    6. Xia, Z.
    (2017). Conditional deletion of Ndufs4 in dopaminergic neurons promotes Parkinson's disease-like non-motor symptoms without loss of dopamine neurons. Sci. Rep. 7, 44989. doi:10.1038/srep44989
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. Connolly, K. J.
    (1966). Locomotor activity in Drosophila as a function of food deprivation. Nature 209, 224. doi:10.1038/209224a0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Copeland, J. M.,
    2. Cho, J.,
    3. Lo, T.,
    4. Hur, J. H.,
    5. Bahadorani, S.,
    6. Arabyan, T.,
    7. Rabie, J.,
    8. Soh, J. and
    9. Walker, D. W.
    (2009). Extension of Drosophila life span by RNAi of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. Curr. Biol. 19, 1591-1598. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.08.016
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Da-Rè, C.,
    2. von Stockum, S.,
    3. Biscontin, A.,
    4. Millino, C.,
    5. Cisotto, P.,
    6. Zordan, M.,
    7. Zeviani, M. A.,
    8. Bernardi, P.,
    9. De Pittà, C. and
    10. Costa, R.
    (2014). Leigh syndrome in Drosophila melanogaster: morphological and biochemical characterization of surf1 post-transcriptional silencing. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 29235-29246. doi:10.1074/jbc.M114.602938
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. de Haas, R.,
    2. Russel, F. G. and
    3. Smeitink, J. A.
    (2016). Gait analysis in a mouse model resembling Leigh disease. Behav. Brain Res. 296, 191-198. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2015.09.006
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. de Laat, P.,
    2. Zweers, H. E.,
    3. Knuijt, S.,
    4. Smeitink, J. A.,
    5. Wanten, G. J. and
    6. Janssen, M. C.
    (2015). Dysphagia, malnutrition and gastrointestinal problems in patients with mitochondrial disease caused by the m3243A>G mutation. Neth. J. Med. 73, 30-36.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Deshpande, S. A.,
    2. Carvalho, G. B.,
    3. Amador, A.,
    4. Phillips, A. M.,
    5. Hoxha, S.,
    6. Lizotte, K. J. and
    7. Ja, W. W.
    (2014). Quantifying Drosophila food intake: comparative analysis of current methodology. Nat. Methods 11, 535-540. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2899
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Diegelmann, S.,
    2. Jansen, A.,
    3. Jois, S.,
    4. Kastenholz, K.,
    5. Velo Escarcena, L.,
    6. Strudthoff, N. and
    7. Scholz, H.
    (2017). The CApillary FEeder assay measures food intake in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Vis. Exp. 121, e55024. doi:10.3791/55024
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    1. Dietzl, G.,
    2. Chen, D.,
    3. Schnorrer, F.,
    4. Su, K.-C.,
    5. Barinova, Y.,
    6. Fellner, M.,
    7. Gasser, B.,
    8. Kinsey, K.,
    9. Oppel, S.,
    10. Scheiblauer, S. et al.
    (2007). A genome-wide transgenic RNAi library for conditional gene inactivation in Drosophila. Nature 448, 151-156. doi:10.1038/nature05954
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Eidhof, I.,
    2. Fenckova, M.,
    3. Elurbe, D. M.,
    4. van de Warrenburg, B.,
    5. Castells-Nobau, A. and
    6. Schenck, A.
    (2017). High-throughput analysis of locomotor behavior in the Drosophila island assay. J. Vis. Exp. e55892. doi:10.3791/55892
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    1. Fassone, E. and
    2. Rahman, S.
    (2012). Complex I deficiency: clinical features, biochemistry and molecular genetics. J. Med. Genet. 49, 578-590. doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-101159
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Fassone, E.,
    2. Duncan, A. J.,
    3. Leonard, J. V. and
    4. Rahman, S.
    (2011). A novel homozygous deletion in NDUFS4 causes complex I deficient Leigh syndrome. Mitochondrion 11, 656. doi:10.1016/j.mito.2011.03.065
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    1. Flockhart, I.,
    2. Booker, M.,
    3. Kiger, A.,
    4. Boutros, M.,
    5. Armknecht, S.,
    6. Ramadan, N.,
    7. Richardson, K.,
    8. Xu, A.,
    9. Perrimon, N. and
    10. Mathey-Prevot, B.
    (2006). FlyRNAi: the Drosophila RNAi screening center database. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, D489-D494. doi:10.1093/nar/gkj114
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    1. Foriel, S.,
    2. Willems, P.,
    3. Smeitink, J.,
    4. Schenck, A. and
    5. Beyrath, J.
    (2015). Mitochondrial diseases: Drosophila melanogaster as a model to evaluate potential therapeutics. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 63, 60-65. doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2015.01.024
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. ↵
    1. Garcia, C. J.,
    2. Khajeh, J.,
    3. Coulanges, E.,
    4. Chen, E. I. and
    5. Owusu-Ansah, E.
    (2017). Regulation of mitochondrial complex I biogenesis in Drosophila flight muscles. Cell Rep. 20, 264-278. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.015
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    1. Gasque, G.,
    2. Conway, S.,
    3. Huang, J.,
    4. Rao, Y. and
    5. Vosshall, L. B.
    (2013). Small molecule drug screening in Drosophila identifies the 5HT2A receptor as a feeding modulation target. Sci. Rep. 3, srep02120. doi:10.1038/srep02120
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Green, E. W.,
    2. Fedele, G.,
    3. Giorgini, F. and
    4. Kyriacou, C. P.
    (2014). A Drosophila RNAi collection is subject to dominant phenotypic effects. Nat. Methods 11, 222-223. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2856
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Guerrero-Castillo, S.,
    2. Baertling, F.,
    3. Kownatzki, D.,
    4. Wessels, H. J.,
    5. Arnold, S.,
    6. Brandt, U. and
    7. Nijtmans, L.
    (2017). The assembly pathway of mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I. Cell Metab. 25, 128-139. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2016.09.002
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. ↵
    1. Itskov, P. M.,
    2. Moreira, J.-M.,
    3. Vinnik, E.,
    4. Lopes, G.,
    5. Safarik, S.,
    6. Dickinson, M. H. and
    7. Ribeiro, C.
    (2014). Automated monitoring and quantitative analysis of feeding behaviour in Drosophila. Nat. Commun. 5, 4560. doi:10.1038/ncomms5560
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Ja, W. W.,
    2. Carvalho, G. B.,
    3. Mak, E. M.,
    4. de la Rosa, N. N.,
    5. Fang, A. Y.,
    6. Liong, J. C.,
    7. Brummel, T. and
    8. Benzer, S.
    (2007). Prandiology of Drosophila and the CAFE assay. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 8253-8256. doi:10.1073/pnas.0702726104
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Johnson, S. C.,
    2. Yanos, M. E.,
    3. Kayser, E.-B.,
    4. Quintana, A.,
    5. Sangesland, M.,
    6. Castanza, A.,
    7. Uhde, L.,
    8. Hui, J.,
    9. Wall, V. Z.,
    10. Gagnidze, A. et al.
    (2013). mTOR inhibition alleviates mitochondrial disease in a mouse model of Leigh syndrome. Science 342, 1524-1528. doi:10.1126/science.1244360
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Joseph, R. M.,
    2. Sun, J. S.,
    3. Tam, E. and
    4. Carlson, J. R.
    (2017). A receptor and neuron that activate a circuit limiting sucrose consumption. Elife 6, e24992. doi:10.7554/eLife.24992
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. ↵
    1. Karamanlidis, G.,
    2. Lee, C. F.,
    3. Garcia-Menendez, L.,
    4. Kolwicz, S. C.,
    5. Suthammarak, W.,
    6. Gong, G.,
    7. Sedensky, M. M.,
    8. Morgan, P. G.,
    9. Wang, W. and
    10. Tian, R.
    (2013). Mitochondrial complex I deficiency increases protein acetylation and accelerates heart failure. Cell Metab. 18, 239-250. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2013.07.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    1. Kisler, J. E.,
    2. Whittaker, R. G. and
    3. Mcfarland, R.
    (2010). Mitochondrial diseases in childhood: a clinical approach to investigation and management. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 52, 422-433. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03605.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Knoppien, P.,
    2. van der Pers, J. N. C. and
    3. van Delden, W.
    (2000). Quantification of locomotion and the effect of food deprivation on locomotor activity in Drosophila. J. Insect Behav. 13, 27-43. doi:10.1023/A:1007759424777
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. ↵
    1. Koene, S.,
    2. Rodenburg, R. J.,
    3. van der Knaap, M. S.
    4. Willemsen, M. A. A. P.,
    5. Sperl, W.,
    6. Laugel, V.,
    7. Ostergaard, E.,
    8. Tarnopolsky, M.,
    9. Martin, M. A.,
    10. Nesbitt, V. et al.
    (2012). Natural disease course and genotype-phenotype correlations in complex I deficiency caused by nuclear gene defects: what we learned from 130 cases. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 35, 737-747. doi:10.1007/s10545-012-9492-z
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Koene, S.,
    2. Wortmann, S. B.,
    3. de Vries, M. C.
    4. Jonckheere, A. I.,
    5. Morava, E.,
    6. de Groot, I. J. M. and
    7. Smeitink, J. A. M.
    (2013). Mitochondrion developing outcome measures for pediatric mitochondrial disorders: which complaints and limitations are most burdensome to patients and their parents? Mitochondrion 13, 15-24. doi:10.1016/j.mito.2012.11.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Koenig, M. K.
    (2008). Presentation and diagnosis of mitochondrial disorders in children. Pediatr. Neurol. 38, 305-313. doi:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2007.12.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Kruse, S. E.,
    2. Watt, W. C.,
    3. Marcinek, D. J.,
    4. Kapur, R. P.,
    5. Schenkman, K. A. and
    6. Palmiter, R. D.
    (2008). Mice with mitochondrial complex I deficiency develop a fatal encephalomyopathy. Cell Metab. 7, 312-320. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2008.02.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    1. Kühnlein, R. P.
    (2011). The contribution of the Drosophila model to lipid droplet research. Prog. Lipid Res. 50, 348-356. doi:10.1016/j.plipres.2011.04.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. ↵
    1. Lindfors, C.,
    2. Nilsson, I. A. K.,
    3. Garcia-roves, P. M.,
    4. Zuberi, A. R. and
    5. Karimi, M.
    (2011). Hypothalamic mitochondrial dysfunction associated with anorexia in the anx/anx mouse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 18108-18113. doi:10.1073/pnas.1114863108
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Manning, S. A.,
    2. Kulkarni, A.,
    3. Vissers, J. H. A. and
    4. Harvey, K. F.
    (2016). A Drosophila RNAi library modulates Hippo pathway-dependent tissue growth. Nat. Commun. 7, 10368. doi:10.1038/ncomms10368
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. ↵
    1. Manzo, A.,
    2. Silies, M.,
    3. Gohl, D. M. and
    4. Scott, K.
    (2012). Motor neurons controlling fluid ingestion in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 6307-6312. doi:10.1073/pnas.1120305109
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Martin, J.-R.
    (2003). Locomotor activity: a complex behavioural trait to unravel. Behav. Process. 64, 145-160. doi:10.1016/S0376-6357(03)00132-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. ↵
    1. Mayr, J. A.,
    2. Haack, T. B.,
    3. Freisinger, P.,
    4. Karall, D.,
    5. Makowski, C.,
    6. Koch, J.,
    7. Feichtinger, R. G.,
    8. Zimmermann, F. A.,
    9. Rolinski, B.,
    10. Ahting, U. et al.
    (2015). Spectrum of combined respiratory chain defects. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 38, 629-640. doi:10.1007/s10545-015-9831-y
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Merkey, A. B.,
    2. Wong, C. K.,
    3. Hoshizaki, D. K. and
    4. Gibbs, A. G.
    (2011). Energetics of metamorphosis in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 57, 1437-1445. doi:10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.07.013
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Morava, E.,
    2. Rodenburg, R.,
    3. van Essen, H. Z.,
    4. De Vries, M. and
    5. Smeitink, J.
    (2006). Dietary intervention and oxidative phosphorylation capacity. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 29, 589. doi:10.1007/s10545-006-0227-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. ↵
    1. Noorda, G.,
    2. Hermans-Peters, M.,
    3. Smeitink, J.,
    4. van Achterberg, T.,
    5. Kemps, H.,
    6. Goverde, W. and
    7. Schoonhoven, L.
    (2007). Mitochondrial disease: needs and problems of children, their parents and family. A systematic review and pilot study into the need for information of parents during the diagnostic phase. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis 30, 333-340. doi:10.1007/s10545-007-0426-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Pandey, U. B. and
    2. Nichols, C. D.
    (2011). Human disease models in Drosophila melanogaster and the role of the fly in therapeutic drug discovery. Pharmacol. Rev. 63, 411-436. doi:10.1124/pr.110.003293
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Parikh, S.,
    2. Saneto, R.,
    3. Falk, M. J.,
    4. Anselm, I.,
    5. Cohen, B. H. and
    6. Haas, R.
    (2009). A modern approach to the treatment of mitochondrial disease. Curr. Treat. Options Neurol. 11, 414-430. doi:10.1007/s11940-009-0046-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Pool, A.-H. and
    2. Scott, K.
    (2014). Feeding regulation in Drosophila. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 29, 57-63. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2014.05.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Qi, W.,
    2. Yang, Z.,
    3. Lin, Z.,
    4. Park, J.,
    5. Suh, G. S. B. and
    6. Wang, L.
    (2015). A quantitative feeding assay in adult Drosophila reveals rapid modulation of food ingestion by its nutritional value. Mol. Brain 8, 87. doi:10.1186/s13041-015-0179-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Quintana, A.,
    2. Kruse, S. E.,
    3. Kapur, R. P.,
    4. Sanz, E. and
    5. Palmiter, R. D.
    (2010). Complex I deficiency due to loss of Ndufs4 in the brain results in progressive encephalopathy resembling Leigh syndrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 10996-11001. doi:10.1073/pnas.0912815107
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    1. Quintana, A.,
    2. Morgan, P. G.,
    3. Kruse, S. E.,
    4. Palmiter, R. D. and
    5. Sedensky, M. M.
    (2012). Altered anesthetic sensitivity of mice lacking Ndufs4, a subunit of mitochondrial complex I. PLoS ONE 7, e42904. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042904
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Rahman, S.,
    2. Blok, R. B.,
    3. Dahl, H.-H. M.,
    4. Danks, D. M.,
    5. Kirby, D. M.,
    6. Chow, C. W.,
    7. Christodoulou, J. and
    8. Thorburn, D. R.
    (1996). Leigh syndrome: clinical features and biochemical and DNA abnormalities. Ann. Neurol. 39, 343-351. doi:10.1002/ana.410390311
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. ↵
    1. Rajan, A. and
    2. Perrimon, N.
    (2013). Of flies and men: insights on organismal metabolism from fruit flies. BMC Biol. 11, 38. doi:10.1186/1741-7007-11-38
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Ramakers, R.,
    2. Koene, S.,
    3. Groothuis, J. T.,
    4. de Laat, P.,
    5. Janssen, M. C. H. and
    6. Smeitink, J.
    (2017). Quantification of gait in mitochondrial m.3243A>G patients: a validation study. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 12, 91. doi:10.1186/s13023-017-0644-y
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  53. ↵
    1. Read, J. L.,
    2. Whittaker, R. G.,
    3. Miller, N.,
    4. Clark, S.,
    5. Taylor, R.,
    6. Mcfarland, R. and
    7. Turnbull, D.
    (2012). Prevalence and severity of voice and swallowing difficulties in mitochondrial disease. Int. J. Lang. Commun. Disord. 47, 106-111. doi:10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00072.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Ro, J.,
    2. Harvanek, Z. M. and
    3. Pletcher, S. D.
    (2014). FLIC: high-throughput, continuous analysis of feeding behaviors in Drosophila. PLoS ONE 9, e101107. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0101107
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Rodenburg, R. J. T.
    (2011). Biochemical diagnosis of mitochondrial disorders. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 34, 283-292. doi:10.1007/s10545-010-9081-y
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Sánchez-Caballero, L.,
    2. Guerrero-Castillo, S. and
    3. Nijtmans, L.
    (2016). Unraveling the complexity of mitochondrial complex I assembly: a dynamic process. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Bioenerg. 1857, 980-990. doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2016.03.031
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  57. ↵
    1. Sánchez-Martínez, A.,
    2. Luo, N.,
    3. Clemente, P.,
    4. Adán, C.,
    5. Hernández-Sierra, R.,
    6. Ochoa, P.,
    7. Fernández-Moreno, M. A.,
    8. Kaguni, L. S. and
    9. Garesse, R.
    (2006). Modeling human mitochondrial diseases in flies. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1757, 1190-1198. doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2006.05.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Sen, A. and
    2. Cox, R. T.
    (2017). Fly models of human diseases: Drosophila as a model for understanding human mitochondrial mutations and disease. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 121, 1-27. doi:10.1016/bs.ctdb.2016.07.001
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  59. ↵
    1. Smeitink, J. A. M.
    (2003). Mitochondrial disorders: clinical presentation and diagnostic dilemmas. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 26, 199-207. doi:10.1023/A:1024489218004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  60. ↵
    1. Stephenson, J.,
    2. Zesiewicz, T.,
    3. Gooch, C.,
    4. Wecker, L.,
    5. Sullivan, K.,
    6. Jahan, I. and
    7. Kim, S. H.
    (2015). Gait and balance in adults with Friedreich's ataxia. Gait Posture 41, 603-607. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.01.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Swalwell, H.,
    2. Kirby, D. M.,
    3. Blakely, E. L.,
    4. Mitchell, A.,
    5. Salemi, R.,
    6. Sugiana, C.,
    7. Compton, A. G.,
    8. Tucker, E. J.,
    9. Ke, B.-X.,
    10. Lamont, P. J. et al.
    (2011). Respiratory chain complex I deficiency caused by mitochondrial DNA mutations. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 19, 769-775. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2011.18
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Tyynismaa, H.,
    2. Carroll, C. J.,
    3. Raimundo, N.,
    4. Ahola-Erkkilä, S.,
    5. Wenz, T.,
    6. Ruhanen, H.,
    7. Guse, K.,
    8. Hemminki, A. and
    9. Peltola-mjøsund, K. E.
    (2010). Mitochondrial myopathy induces a starvation-like response. Hum. Mol. Genet. 19, 3948-3958. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddq310
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  63. ↵
    1. van den Engel-Hoek, L.,
    2. Knuijt, S.,
    3. van Gerven, M. H. J. C.,
    4. Lagarde, M. L. J.,
    5. Groothuis, J. T.,
    6. de Groot, I. J. M. and
    7. Janssen, M. C. H.
    (2017). The 6-min mastication test: a unique test to assess endurance of continuous chewing, normal values, reliability, reproducibility and usability in patients with mitochondrial disease. J. Oral Rehabil. 44, 155-162. doi:10.1111/joor.12481
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  64. ↵
    1. Wang, A.,
    2. Mouser, J.,
    3. Pitt, J.,
    4. Promislow, D. and
    5. Kaeberlein, M.
    (2016). Rapamycin enhances survival in a Drosophila model of mitochondrial disease. Oncotarget 7, 80131-80139. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.12560
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  65. ↵
    1. Wortmann, S. B.,
    2. Zweers-van Essen, H.,
    3. Rodenburg, R. J. T.,
    4. van den Heuvel, L. P.,
    5. de Vries, M. C.,
    6. Rasmussen-Conrad, E.,
    7. Smeitink, J. A. M. and
    8. Morava, E.
    (2009). Mitochondrial energy production correlates with the age-related BMI. Pediatr. Res. 65, 103-108. doi:10.1203/PDR.0b013e31818d1c8a
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  66. ↵
    1. Yang, Z.,
    2. Yu, Y.,
    3. Zhang, V.,
    4. Tian, Y.,
    5. Qi, W. and
    6. Wang, L.
    (2015). Octopamine mediates starvation-induced hyperactivity in adult Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 5219-5224. doi:10.1073/pnas.1417838112
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  67. ↵
    1. Yu, Y.,
    2. Huang, R.,
    3. Ye, J.,
    4. Zhang, V.,
    5. Wu, C.,
    6. Cheng, G.,
    7. Jia, J. and
    8. Wang, L.
    (2016). Regulation of starvation-induced hyperactivity by insulin and glucagon signaling in adult Drosophila. Elife 5, 1-19. doi:10.7554/eLife.15693
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

RSSRSS

Keywords

  • Disease model
  • Drosophila model
  • Feeding impairment
  • Mitochondrial disease

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Disease Models & Mechanisms.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Feeding difficulties, a key feature of the Drosophila NDUFS4 mitochondrial disease model
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Disease Models & Mechanisms
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Disease Models & Mechanisms web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Feeding difficulties, a key feature of the Drosophila NDUFS4 mitochondrial disease model
Sarah Foriel, Julien Beyrath, Ilse Eidhof, Richard J. Rodenburg, Annette Schenck, Jan A. M. Smeitink
Disease Models & Mechanisms 2018 11: dmm032482 doi: 10.1242/dmm.032482 Published 27 March 2018
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Feeding difficulties, a key feature of the Drosophila NDUFS4 mitochondrial disease model
Sarah Foriel, Julien Beyrath, Ilse Eidhof, Richard J. Rodenburg, Annette Schenck, Jan A. M. Smeitink
Disease Models & Mechanisms 2018 11: dmm032482 doi: 10.1242/dmm.032482 Published 27 March 2018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Mutant Cx30-A88V mice exhibit hydrocephaly and sex-dependent behavioral abnormalities, implicating a functional role for Cx30 in the brain
  • Resolving the heterogeneity of diaphragmatic mesenchyme: a novel mouse model of congenital diaphragmatic hernia
  • Interpreting the pathogenicity of Joubert syndrome missense variants in Caenorhabditis elegans
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Subject collections

  • Rare diseases
  • Drosophila as a Disease Model

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Biology Open

Advertisement

DMM and COVID-19

We are aware that the COVID-19 pandemic is having an unprecedented impact on researchers worldwide. The Editors of all The Company of Biologists’ journals have been considering ways in which we can alleviate concerns that members of our community may have around publishing activities during this time. Read about the actions we are taking at this time.

Please don’t hesitate to contact the Editorial Office if you have any questions or concerns.


Professor Elizabeth Patton appointed as DMM’s next Editor-in-Chief

We are pleased to announce that The Company of Biologists directors have appointed Professor Elizabeth Patton as DMM's new Editor-in-Chief. As Paresh Vyas writes in his Editorial, Liz ‘brings vitality and a passion for the remit of DMM, and is deeply embedded in the community.’


Did you know DMM Conference Travel Grants can be used for online meetings?

With travel restrictions still in place, we want to continue supporting early-career researchers in their careers. DMM’s Conference Travel Grants can now be used to attend virtual and online scientific meetings, workshops, conferences and training courses.

The current application round closes on 8 February 2021 – find out more.


Identification of MYOM2 as a candidate gene in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and Tetralogy of Fallot, and its functional evaluation in the Drosophila heart

Research from Silke Sperling and colleagues uses Drosophila to identify MYOM2 as a candidate gene in congenital heart malformations in this issue’s Editor’s choice.


C. elegans as a disease model

A new Research article from Doyle et al., models spinal muscular atrophy in C. elegans to show that that targeting therapies to muscle cells is more effective than neuronal delivery. Find more research using C. elegans as a disease model in our latest subject collection.


Call for papers – The RAS Pathway: Diseases, Therapeutics and Beyond

Our upcoming special issue is now welcoming submissions until 1 April 2021. Guest-edited by Donita Brady (Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, USA) and Arvin Dar (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, USA), the issue will focus on the targeting the RAS pathway. Find out more about the issue and how to submit your manuscript.


Interview – Kim Landry-Truchon and Nicolas Houde

In an interview, first authors Kim Landry-Truchon and Nicolas Houde discuss their mouse model of the early stages of pleuropulmonary blastoma, reflecting on the implications of their work and the future of their field.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About DMM
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact DMM
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992