Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About DMM
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contact
    • Contact DMM
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Disease Models & Mechanisms
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Advanced search

RSS   Twitter   Facebook   YouTube

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About DMM
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Outstanding paper prize
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contact
    • Contact DMM
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Mecp2 regulates tnfa during zebrafish embryonic development and acute inflammation
M. van der Vaart, O. Svoboda, B. G. Weijts, R. Espín-Palazón, V. Sapp, T. Pietri, M. Bagnat, A. R. Muotri, D. Traver
Disease Models & Mechanisms 2017 10: 1439-1451; doi: 10.1242/dmm.026922
M. van der Vaart
1Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, 92093 CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. van der Vaart
O. Svoboda
1Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, 92093 CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. G. Weijts
1Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, 92093 CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Espín-Palazón
1Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, 92093 CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
V. Sapp
1Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, 92093 CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Pietri
2Federated Department of Biological Sciences, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, 07102 NJ, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Bagnat
3Department of Cell Biology, Duke University, Durham, 27708 NC, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. R. Muotri
1Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, 92093 CA, USA
4Department of Pediatrics/Rady Children's Hospital San Diego, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, 92093 CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Traver
1Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, 92093 CA, USA
5Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, 92093 CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for D. Traver
  • For correspondence: dtraver@ucsd.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    mecp2-deficient zebrafish display inflammation during larval development. (A,C) Representative stereo microscopy images of 2 dpf and 7 dpf wild-type and mecp2-null zebrafish larvae. (B,D) Total body lengths of the 2 dpf and 7 dpf wild-type and mecp2-null larvae, as measured in millimeters (n=15 per condition; Student’s t-test; ***P<0.001; data are representative of three individual experiments). (E,F) Stereo microscopy images of 4 dpf and 7 dpf wild-type and mecp2-null zebrafish illustrating the GI tract phenotypes regularly observed (indicated by arrowheads). The frequency of these phenotypes is shown in relation to the total number of examined animals (19 of 48 mecp2-null animals at 3 dpf; 22 of 46 mecp2-null animals at 7 dpf). (G) qPCR was performed to determine the whole-organism gene expression level of the inflammation marker crp relative to the expression of the housekeeping gene tbp. Wild-type and mecp2-null samples (n=3 with 20 embryos or larvae pooled per sample) were taken every day for the first 5 days of development. The relative fold change versus gene expression in a 1 dpf wild type is shown (one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test; **P<0.01; ns, not significant; data are representative of two individual experiments).

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Neutrophil number and distribution confirm the presence of inflammation in mecp2-null larvae. (A) Total numbers of Tg(mpx:eGFP)-positive neutrophils were counted in 3, 4 and 5 dpf wild-type and mecp2-null larvae using stereo fluorescent microscopy (n=12 larvae per condition pooled from two individual experiments; larvae were scored for three consecutive days). (B) Representative stereo microscopy images of 4 dpf Tg(mpx:eGFP) wild-type and mecp2-null larvae. (C) Numbers of Tg(mpx:eGFP)-positive neutrophils associated with the GI tract of 2, 3, 4 and 5 dpf wild-type and mecp2-null larvae were counted (n≥12 embryos per condition; data are representative of three individual experiments). (D) Representative confocal micrographs (maximum projection) of the GI tracts of 5 dpf Tg(mpx:eGFP) wild-type and mecp2-null larvae in which the GI tract has been delineated with a white dashed line based on the transmitted light images. (E) Representative confocal micrographs (maximum projection) of the brain region of 3 dpf Tg(mpeg1:eGFP) wild-type and mecp2-null larvae. (F) Brain-associated Tg(mpeg1:eGFP)-positive cells were counted for 3 dpf wild-type, heterozygous and mecp2-null larvae (n=7, n=11, n=6, respectively; one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test; ns, not significant; data are representative of two individual experiments). (G) Total numbers of Tg(mpeg1:eGFP)-positive cells were counted in 3, 4 and 5 dpf wild-type and mecp2-null larvae using stereo fluorescent microscopy (n=11 and n=12 embryos per condition, respectively; data are representative of two individual experiments). A Student’s t-test was used for all statistical analyses, except for the data analyzed in F, by comparing wild-type and mecp2-null numbers per day (***P<0.001; **P<0.01; *P<0.05; ns, not significant).

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Expression of central inflammatory cytokines is dysregulated in mecp2-null larvae. (A,B,C) qPCR was performed to determine the whole-organism expression of tnfa from 4 hpf to 7 dpf (A), and il1b and il10 from 1 dpf to 7 dpf (B,C), in wild-type or mecp2-null zebrafish. Gene expression is related to the expression of the housekeeping gene tbp, where the fold change relative to gene expression in 1 dpf wild-type embryos is shown (n=3 with 20 embryos or larvae pooled per sample for 1-7 dpf; 30 embryos were pooled per sample for the 4-12 hpf time points; data are representative of two individual experiments). One-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test was used for all statistical analyses (***P<0.001; **P<0.01; *P<0.05; ns, not significant). (D-K) Representative confocal micrographs of 3 dpf Tg(tnfa:eGFP) wild-type and mecp2-null larvae showing the eGFP expression pattern in brain regions in a lateral view (D,H), brain regions in a dorsal view (E,I), posterior gut epithelium in a lateral view (F,J) and dorsal root ganglion neurons in a lateral view (G,K).

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    mecp2-null larvae are unable to increase tnfa expression during an acute inflammatory response. (A) Schematic of the injection of Alexa Fluor 594-labeled zymosan into the brains of 3 dpf zebrafish larvae. (B) The percentage of zymosan particles phagocytosed by Tg(mpeg1:eGFP)-positive cells in wild-type larvae was determined using confocal microscopy of samples fixed every 5 min after injection (n=5 larvae per time point). (C) Representative confocal micrograph of a wild-type Tg(mpeg1:eGFP) larva at 4 hpi. Asterisks indicate zymosan particles phagocytosed by Tg(mpeg1:eGFP)-positive cells. (D) qPCR was performed to determine the whole-organism gene expression level of il1b, tnfa, il10 and tgfb1 relative to the expression of the housekeeping gene tbp. Samples (n=3 with 10 embryos per sample) were taken at 1, 2, 3 and 4 hpi of zymosan or PBS as a control. The relative fold change of zymosan- versus PBS-injected samples is shown for each time point to account for a possible wounding effect by the injection itself. (E) qPCR was performed to determine the whole-organism expression level of il1b, tnfa, il10 and tgfb1 relative to the expression of the housekeeping gene tbp. Wild-type or mecp2-null samples (n=3 with 10 embryos per sample) were taken at 1, 2, 3 and 4 hpi of zymosan. The relative fold change of zymosan-injected larvae versus uninjected wild-type controls is shown for each time point to not exclude a potential different response in mecp2-null samples towards the wound caused by the injection. One-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test was used for all statistical analyses (***P<0.001; **P<0.01; *P<0.05; ns, not significant; data are representative of at least two individual experiments).

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Re-expression of mecp2 in mecp2-null zebrafish embryos partially rescues tnfa gene expression, while enforced expression of tnfa does not alleviate phenotypes caused by Mecp2 deficiency. (A,B,C) Wild-type and mecp2-null one-cell stage embryos were injected with 50 pg of full-length mecp2 mRNA. qPCR was performed to determine the whole-organism gene expression level of mecp2 (A), tnfa (B) and il1b (C), relative to the expression of the housekeeping gene tbp. Wild-type and mecp2-null samples (n=3 with 30 embryos pooled per sample) were taken at 24 hpf. The relative fold change of each condition versus uninjected wild-type controls is shown. (D,E) Oligonucleotide morpholino targeting tnfa expression was injected as previously described by Candel et al. (2014). Numbers of Tg(mpx:eGFP)-positive neutrophils associated with the GI tract of 2 dpf control and tnfa morpholino-injected larvae were counted (n≥9 embryos per condition) (D), and the total body lengths of 2 dpf control and tnfa morpholino-injected larvae (n≥25 per condition) were measured (E). (F,G) Wild-type and mecp2-null one-cell stage embryos were injected with tnfa cDNA-containing plasmids as previously described by López-Muñoz et al. (2011). Numbers of Tg(mpx:eGFP)-positive neutrophils associated with the GI tract of 3 dpf wild-type or mecp2-null larvae (injected with control or tnfa cDNA-containing plasmids) were counted (n≥12 embryos per condition) (F), and the total body lengths of the larvae were measured (n≥26 embryos per condition) (G). One-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test was used for all statistical analyses involving more than two groups. Student's t-test was used for all statistical analyses comparing two groups (***P<0.001; **P<0.01; *P<0.05; ns, not significant; data are representative of at least two individual experiments).

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    RNA sequencing reveals early developmental effects of mecp2 deficiency relevant to RTT. RNA sequencing was performed on RNA isolated from groups of 6 hpf wild-type and mecp2-null embryos (n=3 biological replicates per condition with 30 embryos pooled per replicate). DESeq2 analysis was performed using http://usegalaxy.org/. (A) A sample-to-sample distances plot for the three biological replicates per condition was used to detect potential outliers. (B) An MA-plot of differential expression caused by Mecp2 deficiency is shown. The log2 fold change is plotted on the y-axis and the average of the counts normalized by size factor is shown on the x-axis. Each gene is represented by a dot. Genes with an adjusted P value <0.05 are shown in red. (C,D) Enriched GO processes for significantly up- or downregulated genes in mecp2-null versus wild-type embryos are listed in the tables. Only GO terms with at least twofold enrichment are shown. For hierarchically clustered GO terms, only the most specific term is included in the list.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Heatmap of differentially expressed genes in mecp2-null embryos. (A) Heatmap displaying the extent of differential gene expression between 6 hpf mecp2-null versus wild-type embryos. The genes incorporated in the heatmap represent all differentially expressed genes that belong to the GO terms ‘developmental growth’ (downregulated genes), ‘myeloid cell differentiation’ (upregulated genes) and ‘hepaticobiliary system development’ (upregulated genes). For all genes, the positive or negative normalized fold change (nFC) for mecp2-null embryos versus wild-type embryos is shown. (B) The graph displays the percentage of significantly differentially expressed genes in mecp2-null versus wild-type embryos with a fold change ≤2 or >2. The following groups are shown: significantly differentially expressed genes belonging to the GO terms ‘developmental growth’, ‘myeloid cell differentiation’ and ‘hepaticobiliary system development’; genome-wide significantly upregulated genes; genome-wide significantly downregulated genes; and all significantly differentially expressed genes.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

RSSRSS

Keywords

  • Inflammation
  • MECP2
  • tnfa
  • Zebrafish
  • Rett syndrome

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Disease Models & Mechanisms.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mecp2 regulates tnfa during zebrafish embryonic development and acute inflammation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Disease Models & Mechanisms
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Disease Models & Mechanisms web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Mecp2 regulates tnfa during zebrafish embryonic development and acute inflammation
M. van der Vaart, O. Svoboda, B. G. Weijts, R. Espín-Palazón, V. Sapp, T. Pietri, M. Bagnat, A. R. Muotri, D. Traver
Disease Models & Mechanisms 2017 10: 1439-1451; doi: 10.1242/dmm.026922
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Mecp2 regulates tnfa during zebrafish embryonic development and acute inflammation
M. van der Vaart, O. Svoboda, B. G. Weijts, R. Espín-Palazón, V. Sapp, T. Pietri, M. Bagnat, A. R. Muotri, D. Traver
Disease Models & Mechanisms 2017 10: 1439-1451; doi: 10.1242/dmm.026922

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • The infantile myofibromatosis NOTCH3 L1519P mutation leads to hyperactivated ligand-independent Notch signaling and increased PDGFRB expression
  • Altered cytoskeletal arrangement in induced pluripotent stem cells and motor neurons from patients with riboflavin transporter deficiency
  • Cardiovascular phenotype of the Dmdmdx rat – a suitable animal model for Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Subject collections

  • Zebrafish as a Disease Model
  • Rare diseases

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Biology Open

Advertisement

DMM and COVID-19

We are aware that the COVID-19 pandemic is having an unprecedented impact on researchers worldwide. The Editors of all The Company of Biologists’ journals have been considering ways in which we can alleviate concerns that members of our community may have around publishing activities during this time. Read about the actions we are taking at this time.

Please don’t hesitate to contact the Editorial Office if you have any questions or concerns.


Monica Justice bids farewell to DMM

In her farewell Editorial, outgoing Editor-in-Chief Monica Justice reminds us of the past half-decade of growth and of DMM's commitment to support the disease modelling community, concluding, “The knowledge and experience I gained during my time as Senior Editor and EiC at DMM is invaluable: working within a not-for-profit community publishing environment is a joy.”


3D imaging of beta cell mass in diabetic mouse models

In their inducible mouse model of diabetes, Roostalu et al. demonstrate how quantitative light-sheet imaging can capture changes in individual islets to help pharmacological research in diabetes.

Visit our YouTube channel to watch more videos from DMM, our sister journals and the Company.


Modelling Joubert syndrome patient-derived mutations in C. elegans

In this issue’s Editor’s choice, Karen Lange and colleagues used C. elegans to model and characterise two patient-derived mutations that cause the ciliopathy Joubert syndrome.


Interview – Karen Lange

First author of our current Editor’s choice, Karen Lange takes us behind the scenes of the paper, and shares her thoughts on how the lack of both time and job security will impact her research.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About DMM
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact DMM
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992